The Next Five Short Stories in The Best American Short Stories 2025

by James Wallace Harris, 8/25/26

When I was a kid, I wanted to grow up to be a science fiction writer because I loved reading science fiction. I began thinking about writing after subscribing to science fiction magazines in 1967 and learning how they paid writers. Science fiction magazines and anthologies were my introduction to the short story.

I’m pretty sure they introduced us to literary short stories in junior high, but they made no impact on me. In the 12th grade, I took a creative writing class. I can’t remember any of the stories I wrote for that class, or even the teacher’s name. In college, I also took creative writing classes as electives for my English major. In the 1990s, I got into an MFA program for creative writing. I still have some of the stories I wrote for it.

In all those writing classes, my teachers discouraged us from writing science fiction, fantasy, mysteries, and other genre-type stories. My teachers pleaded with us to write about what we knew. I didn’t tell them that what I knew most was science fiction.

In 2002, I went to Clarion West Writers’ Workshop for six weeks in Seattle, Washington. Its focus was science fiction, including a week’s instruction from Gardner Dozois, the editor of Asimov’s Science Fiction at the time. Saturday, I received a packet from Clarion West of my old stories. I haven’t had the heart to open them. It was not long after that I gave up hope of ever publishing a short story or writing a novel. Writing fiction was a lifelong dream that I never worked hard enough to make a reality.

In 2020, I joined a Facebook group that read one science fiction short story a day. For almost five years, I kept up with that pace. I had hoped it would inspire me to write again, but it never did.

Most years, around October, I get the latest volume of Best American Short Stories, believing it will inspire me to write again. That hasn’t worked either. However, it does show me what’s going on in literary fiction. It seems that since the 1990s, literary writers have sometimes embraced writing ideas and techniques from genre writers. But then, I feel genre writers have become more literary. I wonder how many of them go through MFA writing programs.

The short story was replaced by the television show in the 1950s. The short story used to be the primary source of 30- to 60-minute doses of fiction. That was the primary product of broadcast television. Streaming television has changed things. Its product is now eight to twelve 30- to 60-minute episodes that tell one story. People often binge-watch them. They’re novel replacements.

An episode of The Big Bang Theory or Law and Order is essentially a short story.

On the other hand, many people have switched to short videos that run a few minutes. They are the equivalent of flash fiction.

Evidently, the short story, whether written or filmed, is no longer appealing. Literary magazines and genre magazines struggle to find audiences larger than several hundred to a few thousand. That’s a shame, because fiction at that length is rather distinctive.

The variety of story types and writing styles is striking in any anthology. In the time it takes to read or listen to one average bestseller, you can read or listen to twenty short stories. A good short story makes an intense emotional impact on the reader. Novels do this too, but require a longer commitment. And I don’t know if all those extra words pay off any more.

The main reason I failed at writing was that I couldn’t create that emotional impact. Here is the next set of stories I read in The Best American Short Stories 2025. I’m going to try to entice you to read them by describing the setup for their emotional impact.

“Maritza and Carman” by Lyn Di Iorio

Maritza was taken in by Juancho after Hurricane Maria hit Puerto Rico. She didn’t know who she was or where she came from. Juancho let her work in his cafe, and over the year she found a kind of inner peace working in his garden. Then, Juancho saw Maritza’s picture in the newspaper. It was a picture of a policewoman named Carmen Sandin de O’Farrell. She had rescued people during Hurricane Irma, but was described as having died trying to save her daughter, Taina O’Farrell, in Hurricane Maria.

They contact Taina, who comes to visit. Carmen is told who she was, and that triggers some memories. But as Taina recounts how her mother saved her and her boyfriend, Carmen remembers something different.

Did Carmen lose her memory because of physical injury in the hurricane, or because of what her daughter did? Will she return to her old life?

“Gray, Cotton, White Lace Edges” by Isabelle Fang

May is a college girl who sells her worn underwear to men with fetishes. Then she gets a job working with Bridget on a reality TV show and decides her underwear-selling days are over. May has avoided meeting any of her customers, but her best customer, Bill, asks to meet her after she informs him that he will no longer be getting her panties in the mail. She puts him off by telling him she’ll be out of town on location for three months.

The TV show is about an older white man, John, who has divorced his imported Asian wife and is marrying 19-year-old Ally, who is flying in from the Philippines. May befriends Ally. Her job is to help pull off a wedding for the show, but she identifies with Ally because her father left her mom for a young woman like Ally.

The impact of all of this conveys the icky compromises women have to make with men. Yet, readers are surprised at the decisions the women make. May does meet with Bill, and the ending is an interesting surprise.

“Time of the Preacher” by Bret Anthony Johnston

Holland builds wooden fences, pergolas, decks, and even tree houses. He’s doing great business during Covid because everyone wants to isolate themselves but spend time outdoors. Holland is divorced and misses his ex, Mandy, who is about to remarry. Mandy texts Holland, asking him to come get a snake out of a house she’s renting. A house rented by a preacher who skipped out on her.

Holland goes right over, and they don’t find the snake. He wants to think Mandy just wanted his company and made up the story about the snake. The story is really about how Mandy sees Holland and how he sees her. Holland is not like the icky men in the previous story, but he’s disappointing to Mandy in other ways.

Love the ending, but wonder what it implies.

“Underwater” by Hannah Kingsley-Ma

Sam, the wife, is married to Sam, the husband. Sam, the man, has a twin sister, Lizzy. Sam, the woman, is jealous of her husband’s relationship with his sister. They might be too close.

Sam’s family is jealous that she spends all her vacation time with his family. Sam’s family is just as weird as her in-laws. Sam’s sister, Sarah, has a son who wants to saw off her legs.

This story is a comedy about strange relationships. It asks: who is fucked up? Or should ask: who is fucked up the most?

We’re only given more and more proof of weirdness. My favorite part deals with Lizzy’s weird dog, Dotty.

I’d love to see this story as a TV series.

“Drapetomania” by William Lohier

Drapetomania was a fake, racist mental illness proposed in 1851 by American physician Samuel A. Cartwright. He claimed that enslaved Black people who tried to run away from bondage were suffering from a disease.

William Lohier turns “Drapetomania” into an allegorical horror story.

Nina is in class when Jackson asks to leave class. He leaves and begins running. He keeps running until he dies. We’re told the world has been hit by a condition that makes black people start running and keep running until they die.

Nina has already lost a sister, Demetria, to this condition. Nina is introduced to a senior, Jai, who is a reporter for the local public radio station. She wants to follow Nina to cover the running mania. Nina takes Jai home to meet her mother and brother TomTom.

Jai’s father is Japanese, but her mother is Guyanese. She doesn’t know if she’s black enough to catch the mania.

From here, the story becomes bleaker and bleaker. “Drapetomania” is really a genre story, with a good plot. It has a surreal, nightmarish ending. There’s enough here to make a movie.

It shuddered and rumbled and moaned. Beyond TomTom’s lithe back I could see only a weltering sliver of sun. Runners, I realized. I edged into a sprint. The motel and the moon and the world behind me—it all fell away. Beside me Jai stumbled and slowed, but I couldn’t turn back. We were neck and neck, TomTom and I, blood and blood. The sun enraged the sky and I saw them, before us, haloed in the rising dust. Their feet played the earth like an enormous drum. We ran toward them, enraged, and sweat stung my eyes but I didn’t need to see TomTom to know what his face looked like. Mine looked the same.

Then we were among them, and I could barely see through the grit. Soon it blotted out the sky, and the trees, and left only a red sun and our persons. It was so beautiful, I lost my breath. My feet pounded against the ground until I could no longer feel them.

If “Drapetomania” were stretched out to novel length, would it have a greater impact? I don’t think so. The story isn’t realistic, but it does have great symbolic impact. I can easily imagine Holden Caulfield being so disturbed that he started running and kept running until he died.

Wrapping Up …

I’d love to have written any of these stories. There’s a reason that at least three editors have chosen them. The single most important thing I learned at Clarion West Writers’ Workshop was “great fiction is the accumulation of significant details.” It’s all those details that make us feel for the characters. I seldom could gather enough details to make my stories ignite.

I still have the fantasy of writing science fiction. I’ve thought for years, “If I could only write one good story that got published.” I even know the story and characters I want to write. I’ve attempted that story many times. But I can never finish it in any form that works as well as these five stories.

JWH

Audible Has Granted Some of My 2018 Wishes

by James Wallace Harris, 4/13/26

When I joined Audible back in 2002, I wanted to reread (by listening) my favorite science fiction books I had read growing up. Audible did a fantastic job producing hundreds of science fiction novels first published in the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s. However, there were quite a few I kept waiting to hear. In 2018, I published a list of 67 science fiction books I hoped Audible would produce. I came across that list today. I thought I’d reprint it, annotating which wishes were granted.

Unfortunately, Audible has quietly dropped many old science fiction books from its catalog. On a discussion board today, one member described a visit to Barnes & Noble, where he looked to see how many old science fiction titles that Baby Boomers grew up reading were available for new readers to buy. I’m not sure he would find any of these books in B&N’s science fiction section. I do give Audible credit for keeping a great many mid-20th-century SF in print. Luckily, I bought hundreds of old science fiction books on Audible, and they’re still in my library, even if they are no longer for sale.

Here’s my wishlist from 2018. I link to Wikipedia for those titles that are now available at Audible. (It was the best way I could make them stand out.)

Per the comment below, I’ve looked for these books on YouTube, and marked those titles.)

  1. A Voyage to Arcturus (1920) by David Lindsay (YouTube)
  2. The World of Null-A (1948) by A. E. Van Vogt (YouTube)
  3. The Voyage of the Space Beagle (1950) by A. E. Van Vogt (YouTube)
  4. The Legion of Time (1952) by Jack Williamson
  5. The Long Loud Silence (1952) by Wilson Tucker
  6. Marooned on Mars (1952) by Lester del Rey
  7. Bring the Jubilee (1953) by Ward Moore
  8. Children of the Atom (1953) Wilma H. Shiras
  9. A Mirror for Observers (1954) by Edgar Pangborn
  10. Mission of Gravity (1954) by Hal Clement
  11. Cities in Flight (1955) by James Blish
  12. Citizen in Space (1955) by Robert Sheckley
  13. Rocket to Limbo (1957) by Alan E. Nourse (YouTube)
  14. Wasp (1957) by Eric Frank Russell
  15. The Enemy Stars (1958) Poul Anderson
  16. The Lincoln Hunters (1958) by Wilson Tucker
  17. The Fourth “R” (1959) by George O. Smith (YouTube)
  18. The High Crusade (1960) by Poul Anderson (YouTube)
  19. Hothouse (1962) by Brian W. Aldiss
  20. Second Ending (1962) by James White
  21. Davy (1964) by Edgar Pangborn
  22. Simulacron-3 (1964) by Daniel Galouye
  23. Earthblood (1966) by Keith Laumer and Rosel George Brown
  24. Empire Star (1966)
  25. The Witches of Karres (1966) by James H. Schmitz
  26. Lords of the Starship (1967) by Mark S. Geston
  27. Camp Concentration (1968) by Thomas Disch
  28. Of Men and Monsters (1968) by William Tenn (YouTube)
  29. Omnivore (1968) by Piers Anthony
  30. Past Master (1968) by R. A. Lafferty
  31. Space Chanty (1968) by R. A. Lafferty
  32. The Last Starship from Earth (1968) by John Boyd
  33. The Still, Small Voice of Trumpets (1968) by Lloyd Biggle, Jr.
  34. Behold the Man (1969) by Michael Moorcock
  35. Bug Jack Barron (1969) by Norman Spinrad
  36. Macroscope (1969) by Piers Anthony
  37. And Chaos Died (1970) by Joanna Russ
  38. The Year of the Quiet Sun (1970) by Wilson Tucker
  39. The Doors of His Face, The Lamps of His Mouth (1971) by Roger Zelazny
  40. The Fifth Head of Cerberus (1972) by Gene Wolfe (YouTube)
  41. The Listeners (1972) by James Gunn
  42. The Continuous Katherine Mortenhoe (The Unsleeping Eye) (1973) by D. G. Compton
  43. The Centauri Device (1974) by M. John Harrison
  44. Orbitsville (1975) by Bob Shaw
  45. The Female Man (1975) by Joanna Russ
  46. The Shockwave Rider (1975) by John Brunner
  47. Trouble on Triton (1976) by Samuel R. Delany
  48. On Wings of a Song (1979) by Thomas M. Disch
  49. Ridley Walker (1980) by Russell Hoban (YouTube)
  50. No Enemy But Time (1982) by Michael Bishop
  51. Native Tongue (1984) by Suzette Haden Elgin
  52. Ancient of Days (1985) by Michael Bishop
  53. The Falling Woman (1986) by Pat Murphy
  54. Mindplayers (1988) by Pat Cadigan
  55. Her Smoke Rose Up Forever (1990) by James Tiptree, Jr.
  56. A Woman of the Iron People (1991) by Eleanor Arnason
  57. Sarah Canary (1991) – Karen Joy Fowler
  58. Synners (1991) by Pat Cadigan
  59. China Mountain Zhang (1992) by Maureen F. McHugh
  60. Ammonite (1993) by Nicola Griffith
  61. Galatea 2.2 (1995) by Richard Powers
  62. Ingathering: The Complete People Stories of Zenna Henderson (1995)
  63. Holy Fire (1996) by Bruce Sterling
  64. The Book of the Long Sun (1993-96) by Gene Wolfe
  65. Aye, and Gomorrah (2003) by Samuel R. Delany
  66. Store of the Worlds (2012) by Robert Sheckley
  67. The Future is Female (2018) edited by Lisa Yaszek

JWH

Reading at 13 vs. 73

By James Wallace Harris, 10/19/25

At thirteen, I read books entirely differently than I do now at seventy-three. I think everyone does, but it’s not apparent why. Our memory gives us the illusion that we’ve always been the same person. But if we think about it, there is plenty of evidence that we couldn’t have been.

I’ve been thinking about the difference between my younger reading self and my older reading self while writing a review of The Foundation Trilogy by Isaac Asimov for my other blog. Every so often, I reread a book I read as a teenager. For some books, it’s a nostalgic return to a familiar, comfortable place. For most books, it’s just vague recollections.

My first realization from trying to reconstruct my reading mind at age 13 was to remember that I read very fast. I consumed books like potato chips. Reading was like casually watching TV. Words just flowed past my eyes, and I didn’t always pay attention to every word. I just read to find out what happened.

I have a fond memory of reading The Foundation Trilogy, but a limited one. I liked the idea of a galactic empire in decline. However, the only chapter I can remember is the first one, “The Psychohistorians.” It wasn’t until decades later that I learned that the trilogy was a fix-up novel based on nine stories running from short stories to novellas.

Thinking about it now, I realize that most of the ideas in the book didn’t mean much to me at 13. I had not studied or read about the Roman Empire, Asimov’s inspiration. Actually, I probably didn’t know what an empire was either. Nor did I understand all the references to nobility, aristocracy, and politics.

As a teenager, I mostly read science fiction books. I did read some popular science books too. My awareness of the world and my vocabulary were limited. However, I didn’t know that. And I wasn’t the kind of person who looked up words I didn’t know. What’s weird is that I was a kind of know-it-all.

One way to judge my teenage brilliance was that my favorite TV show at the time was Gilligan’s Island. When I catch that show today, I can only assume I was brain-dead back then.

I’ve tried to reread The Foundation Trilogy twice now. The first time was in 2015, and now in 2025. In both cases, I could only finish the first book of the trilogy. I loved the first story, but with each additional story, I detested them more.

At first, I thought that Asimov’s most famous books were just bad. But I’ve known people smarter than me, and just as old, who say they still loved the Foundation series. One woman in our reading group said the Foundation stories were a great comfort to reread. And I recently heard that twenty million copies of the series have been sold.

Not only was my current reading self different from my younger reading self, but I’m out of step with millions of readers. This got me thinking about the different modes of reading.

I think the most basic mode is just to let fiction flow over you. You read whatever pleases you. And you don’t think about why.

Then, as we age, we become more judgmental. We learn more about life and reading. We develop a process of natural selection by rejecting what we don’t like. We don’t think much about why we don’t like what we don’t like. We just evolve into a reading machine that knows what it likes.

Two other reading modes are: English teachers or literary critics. These are very critical modes, and often they take the fun out of reading. I think as I’ve gotten older, my reading habits have taken on a bit of these two modes. While in them, it’s all too easy to shoot Asimov down.

However, I’ve discovered another mode recently when I read “Foundation” for the fourth time. “Foundation” was the first story published in the series in 1942. While reading this story yet again, I kept admiring Asimov for where he succeeded and not where he failed.

In my rereadings, I’ve always come to the series wanting to love it. And I’ve always been disappointed by how much I didn’t. But with this reading, I worked to think like Asimov. What was he trying to do, and how did he go about doing it?

I’m in the process of documenting this for my other blog, Classics of Science Fiction. I’m writing this now because the other post is going to take a long while to complete.

I never would have put this much effort into reading a story when I was a teen. Or any time before I was 73.

One reason I dislike this story in recent years is my skepticism. I don’t believe humans will ever travel to the stars, much less form a galactic empire. Another reading mode I’m trying to develop is to read with the mind of a person from when the story was first published.

Trying to read like Asimov thought and how science fiction fans felt in 1942 is difficult. I’m reminded of Samuel R. Delany’s concepts of simplex, complex, and multiplex that he described in his story Empire Star. I started out as a simplex reader and eventually evolved into a complex one. Now I’m moving into a multiplex reader.

Multiplex thinking often involves holding contradictory viewpoints. I really dislike the Foundation stories. But if I work at it and look at them in just the right way, I can like them too. It’s hard. It’s a Sisyphean struggle learning to admire something that triggers so many annoyances, but I’m working on it.

JWH

My Attachment to Old Magazines

by James Wallace Harris, 9/6/25

I’ve always loved magazines. I worked six years in the periodicals department of a university library. As a kid, I loved all kinds of magazines. Even before I could read, my sister and I found a pile of old magazines in the attic of the house my parents were renting. The pile was as high as we were. It was old picture magazines, like Life and Look. Becky and I loved looking at the pictures. Magazines were like television, showing us people and places we’d never seen.

Later on, when I had a few coins, I’d buy magazines like Popular Science and MAD. Eventually, I discovered science fiction magazines. My favorite was The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction, but I also loved Galaxy, Analog, Amazing, and Fantastic. I eventually subscribed to the first three around 1968. I also loved finding old issues at used bookshops for a dime or quarter.

By 1975, I had collected more than three-fourths of F&SF’s back issues. By then, I had also acquired pulps going back to 1928. Holding those magazines made me feel like I owned a piece of the past. I loved that. But in 1975, I had to sell my magazine collection.

Then in the 2010s, I started collecting those old magazines again through eBay. I eventually found 90% of the issues of F&SF published before 1975, and about 30% of those published after that. I also picked up about 95% of Galaxy.

Today, I started thinking about selling those old magazines. I took down the December 1961 issue of F&SF and read the beginning of each story. Every story hooked me, but I didn’t keep reading. I have this tremendous attachment to these old magazines, but I also feel a great need to have fewer possessions.

I have scans of all these magazines that I read on my tablet. In fact, it’s easier to read the scans than the original paper copies. The paper copies are becoming fragile. They are collector items, and I don’t want to hurt them.

I considered donating my magazine collection to the Friends of the Library, but I worry they won’t receive the love they deserve. I’m arranging to sell them on eBay. That way, a collector will acquire them. But it’s disturbing me to do this.

When I held the December 1961 issue of F&SF, it triggered a wave of nostalgia. It hurt me to imagine parting with it. I don’t value things. My truck is 26 years old. My watch cost $15. My clothes are Amazon Basics. I see no point in gold or diamonds. There’s nothing I own that’s expensive or trendy. If I’m not using something, I give it away.

If I had the choice between having the Mona Lisa on my wall or a complete run of F&SF, I’d pick the magazines.

Why am I so attached to these old magazines? It’s not the content because I have digital copies of all of them.

The best answer I can think of is this: Holding them recalls the past that no longer exists. If I didn’t have them, I wouldn’t have that connection to the past. Their covers are like photographs that remind me of who I used to be. Buying them on eBay was like buying back part of me that no longer exists.

I need to let them go. I feel like the kid in an old movie who has to free a wild animal they rescued. I rationalize to myself that whoever buys them will love them in the same way I have.

Over the last decade, since I’ve been retired, I’ve been trying to recapture my past by buying things I once owned. But I don’t want to be some old boomer dude living in the past.

Psychologically, I didn’t think I’d live this long. Now that I’m 73, I’m wondering, what if I live another decade or two? I don’t want to waste all that time living in the past.

I wonder if we recall who we were when it feels like the end is approaching. I’m not feeling that now. I wonder if I will buy another run of F&SF when I’m 88?

JWH

Do You Trust What You Read?

by James Wallace Harris, 8/4/25

Yesterday I tried to remember what I thought about as a young kid. I recall a few incidents when I was three, but I don’t start having many memories until I was around twelve or thirteen. The earliest age I can recall being philosophical is from that same period. Before twelve, I can’t remember thinking about things. I probably did. Very young kids are notorious for asking why.

But then I thought of something. It was around age eleven or twelve that I started reading books. The first books I chose were nonfiction about airplanes, space travel, dinosaurs, submarines, cars, and other things that boys like in the fourth and fifth grades. Fourth grade was 1960-1961. I turned ten in late 1961. In the fifth grade (1961-1962), I discovered fiction. Especially, the Oz books by L. Frank Baum and the Tom Swift, Jr. series. In the sixth grade (1962-1963), I got hooked on biographies and a few science fiction books.

It seems obvious that reading inspires thinking.

It was around the sixth grade, or the beginning of the seventh grade, that I can remember thinking about the world. During the seventh grade, and into the eighth, I became an atheist. I remember agonizing over that issue. What I heard in church and from my mother didn’t match what I was experiencing. Nor did it match what I was learning in school or what I was reading. I didn’t read any books on religion or against religion. All the ideas I consumed, especially from books, made me think.

Here’s the kicker. I read a lot of crappy books with crappy ideas, and they infected me. Ideas about flying saucers, reincarnation, ESP, and remembering past lives, like in Bridie Murphy. Most of this came from my uncles, my father’s two brothers.

After rejecting religion, I eventually rejected the occult, spiritualism, and psychic abilities. I rejected them because I read more science books and science fiction. I was skeptical of what was in the science fiction books, but I wanted to believe many of SF’s stupid speculations about the future. The genre promised a more exciting reality that competed with religion.

I didn’t become truly skeptical until many years later. Maybe when I encountered the magazine, The Skeptical Inquirer.

The point I’m trying to make, with this long introduction, is to explain how I was overwhelmingly influenced by what I read. Even after a lifetime of skepticism, I’m easily swayed by concepts I got through books and magazines.

Of course, I’m also susceptible to ideas from my peers, television, and the Internet. Whenever I hear about a neat concept, one that sounds like it helps explain reality, I want to embrace it. I’m easily persuaded by intellectuals and studies that claim to be scientific.

Decades ago, I decided that science was the only cognitive tool humans had developed to explain reality in any consistent fashion. Science is statistical. It doesn’t offer conclusive answers. To truly understand science requires a great deal of science and mathematics. I don’t have those skills. I depend on popular science, and that isn’t the same thing. Accepting an idea based on popular science is similar to being religious and taking a theological concept on faith.

The only way to be scientifically minded without being a scientist is to look for the most consensus among scientific authorities. And this is true for understanding everything that doesn’t fit under the scientific microscope, such as politics, law, ethics, and creating a sustainable society.

Since 2016, I’ve decided that humans are all delusional, including myself. There are dozens, if not hundreds, of ways to be deluded. I decided I couldn’t trust the Internet or television. That I would only trust quality periodicals that had solid editorial policies. Unfortunately, such magazines and newspapers are going out of business.

People no longer want to pay for information. Television and the Internet have conditioned Americans to consume free information. And if you can’t see how that is destroying us, then that’s another delusion you are suffering from.

Humans eagerly embrace untrue concepts that support their desires. We even have labels for that delusion: confirmation bias, wishful thinking, motivated reasoning, and cognitive dissonance reduction.

I’m reminded of what the Jeff Goldblum character said in the movie, The Big Chill. “I don’t know anyone who could get through the day without two or three juicy rationalizations. They’re more important than sex.”

I want to separate myself from my rationalizations. The only way I can think to do that is by reading significant research. What I think depends on what I read. That means being extra careful with selecting my reading.

It also means I need to support the periodicals doing the best job of explaining reality.

JWH