Physics – Auxiliary Memory

What is time? Philosophically and scientifically, that’s a hard question to answer. Can anyone even tell us how many books have been written about time? Here are some of my questions:

Is there one eternal now that exists everywhere, throughout all of reality, in this universe, and all the other universes of the multiverse?
Is time just the 4th dimension? Does the first three dimensions move through a fourth?
Does time actually exist, or is it just an illusion?
Why and how do we feel time?
What is the smallest unit of time?
If something has been ticking since the Big Bang, what is that tick?
Is time mental or physical?
Will time stop if the average temperature of the universe reaches 0 degrees Kelvin?
Is time just change? The motion of atoms, the turning of the Earth, our orbit around the sun, the unfolding of existence since the Big Bang?
Is the astronaut traveling near the speed of light, 300 hundred years ahead of us, time traveling? How could two twins move into two different nows?
Is the now of this space-time different from the now of another space-time universe somewhere else in the multiverse, or is there one universal now in all of reality?
Are the past and future illusions?
Is there a beginning or end of time?
Is time travel possible?
Are there beings that see all of time at once, as if we’re looking across a vast three dimensional space?
Is there anything outside of time?
Do animals sense time?
Would time exist without us?
Is it possible to have two nows?
If there is only now, does it matter what time it is?
If we didn’t measure time would we think it existed?

Time Reborn by Lee Smolin, is a book about physics by a physicist who makes a scientific case for time to be real, and what that means philosophically and for physics. If you are not a physicist, or a fan of popular science books, I’m not sure if I can recommend this book to you as fun reading. It is hard to comprehend all the subtle implications involved with the physics of time. However, if you have a philosophical bent, it might be worth considering. Smolin is making a case that time exists, that it has a direction, and that reality is evolving.

Classical physics always models the universe in mathematics, and quite often time either doesn’t exist, doesn’t matter, or the equations work regardless of the direction of time. Ever since Einstein, scientists have searched for a grand unified theory of everything, hoping to find elegant equations that explained reality. Smolin rejects this goal by making a case that the universe can’t completely be described in mathematics.

To the average person, with common sense, they will reply, “Duh!” Isn’t it obvious that time exists. Isn’t obvious that time has a direction. Isn’t it obvious that mathematics can’t explain everything. Our everyday reality is very far from Big Bang cosmology and quantum physics. Physicists are trying to explain everything, and often it’s easy to ignore the immediate world. When you’re number crunching complex equations to explain reality it’s easy to think time can be ignored, or even space. But black box simulations of the universe aren’t modeling the real universe.

It’s hard to know exactly what Smolin is saying because he gives us so many possibilities to consider, but the epilogue suggests why he wrote the book, to make a philosophical statement. What I got out of the book might not be what Smolin intended, but here’s how I read him.

Smolin wants us to accept time. He wants us to reject the siren song of the timeless. He warns us to be wary of timeless concepts of the universe, whether it’s religion, whether its a mathematical expression, whether it’s a simulation, or even Platonic ideals. Mathematics can approximate some features of the universe, models can simulate some features, but ultimately, people like Max Tegmark and Juan Maldacena are wrong. And reality is neither a creation of God or solipsistic dream.

If time is real, and the universe is evolving, either from the Big Bang, or earlier causes in the multiverse, and there is a universal now, with a past and a future. Smolin doesn’t say it directly, but reality isn’t about us. He’s against the anthropomorphic principle. Realty would have existed without us. We just accidently happened to evolve in a universe that is suitable for life – it wasn’t created for us.

Ultimately, there are limits to what science can see or detect, and to understand. We can’t know why there is something rather than nothing. We have a lot more we can learn about this universe, and we may even learn something about the multiverse, but the ultimate cause of existence is probably beyond physics. To say that time exists does not mean we can prove time origin and end.

That’s the problem with humans. Our religious and philosophical natures want timeless answers to the big ontological questions. Physicists want timeless equations to explain everything. The implication is, if time really exists, then timeless answers don’t.

Ever since I’ve finished this book I’ve tried to meditate on time. To slow my thoughts and focus, hopefully to catch the ticking of time passing. But I can’t. All I can do is notice the slightest changes of things around me. I feel if nothing moved, time would stop, but there’s always something moving. We live in an eternal now.

We have no recollection of events before our existence, nor will we be aware of things after we’re gone.

We can only be here now.

JWH – 3/31/14

If you are the kind of person who believes that science explores reality and would love to catch up on the latest explorations in cosmology and subatomic particles, then The Edge of Physics (2010) by Anil Anathaswamy is the book for you. For years I’ve wanted to know where the big experiments are taking place, and even daydreamed of being a science journalist whose nine-to-five job would be to visit them, well Anil Ananthaswamy has my dream job.

The Edge of Physics is mostly a travel book, and Ananthaswamy even has photos for each of the sites he visited at his web site, collected chapter by chapter. What Anil has done, and I hope he pardons my familiarity, because typing his last name is work, is weave science history in with his travelogue and then explain what each experimental site he visits hopes to achieve.

To enjoy this book does not require a deep understanding of experimental physics or math, just a sense of wonder. I’m praying to Einstein that PBS’s NOVA makes a multipart series based on this book. The average person is afraid of science, and Anil really goes a long way to making it accessible. Anyone who hates that we’re spending billions on theoretical science needs to read this book too, because it makes you wish they’d spend billions more, because in the end, Anil helps us understand the mysteries that are remaining to be discovered. And I hope I live long enough to hear those results reported too.

On the day I started this book I experienced a bit of serendipity. The first chapter is about Mount Wilson and why the work it did back in the 1910s and 1920s is so important to the work being done today. While listening to the book on audio I wished I could see pictures of what Anil was writing about. Well, my wished was grant that very day, because that night NOVA started a two part Hunting the Edge of Space that featured photos and films from the early days of the Mount Wilson Observatory. This documentary overlapped wonderfully with The Edge of Physics.

Now, if NOVA would only film the other chapters. Most people are familiar with visual telescopes but how many have heard of a neutrino telescope? One of the more adventuresome trips Anil makes is to Lake Baikal, to where scientists brave the Siberian winter to build an underwater telescope beneath the ice of a large freshwater lake. Anil also visits two sites in Antarctica, Chile, Hawaii, South Africa, deep underground in Northern Minnesota, India, and of course Switzerland where the LHC is located.

I read Sky and Telescope every month but I never knew there was so many big telescopes around the world. I wish someone would build a web site for telescopes like they have for the Top 500 Supercomputer Sites. And I also wish someone would build the Top 500 largest science research sites. And reading The Edge of Physics I could imagine a new tourist industry based on visiting scientific research. I don’t have the money to take up that hobby right now, but I’m inspired to see if I can find web sites for all the places Anil visited in his book:

All this travel is glamorous but the real value of The Edge of Physics is what Anil reports about the status of all these experiments. He really is trying to show his readers where the edge of physics lies, and what that means. I can’t summarize that, you need to read the book, but if you haven’t read any science books in a few years, you’ll be surprised by how far science has gotten to explaining all of reality. We are far from finished, but wow, scientists are hot on the trail of explaining almost everything. Research in particle physics, dark matter, dark energy, cosmic background radiation, string theory, multiverses, radio astronomy, neutrino astronomy, are converging towards filling in missing puzzle pieces.

It’s like doing a Sudoku puzzle. Finding any one number can solve problems in all nine quadrants. Breakthroughs at any one of these sites Anil visits means more evidence for the other sites. Everything is interrelated. I’d love to be able to list all the areas of research covered in this book with hyperlinks and explanations, but I’d have to write a book and Anil Ananthaswamy has already done that for us. Be sure an visit Anil’s blog for newer reports.

JWH – 4/24/10