How Microsoft Can Make Extra Millions When They Roll Out Windows 8

Dear Microsoft,

When Microsoft rolls out Windows 8 they could make some extra corporate chump change by selling a new version of Windows 7 that’s designed for the “I hate Windows 8” crowd.   I have a feeling there’s going to be millions of Windows 7 fans that will swear they will give up their favorite OS when it’s pried from their cold dead fingers.

I’ve installed two pre-releases of Windows 8 so far, and I just don’t like it.  Sure it has some slick new functions, but I just don’t like the way it looks.  I keep trying Mac OS and Linux, but I prefer Windows 7 by light years.  I just don’t want Windows 7 to go away.

I build my own computers and I worry that Microsoft will stop selling Windows 7.  So Microsoft, I’d like to buy a copy of Windows 7 that I could put on any machine I build in the future.  I know that operating systems only have a limited supported life, but I’d like to stretch my use of Windows 7 until I die.   I’m 60, and I only expect to live another 15-20 years.

Y’all are still supporting Windows XP which came out in 2001, so I should at least get another 12 years out of Windows 7.  The trouble is the weird activation restrictions.  I don’t blame you for copy protecting your product but it does make my plans more difficult.  How about selling a version of Windows 7 with some kind of activation scheme that ties it to me and any machine I build for home use.  It would be nice to also be able to buy a Family pack version for 3 machines.

I know it’s mean of me to call your new baby ugly, but I’m sure you’re used to old farts not wanting to try newfangled ideas.  Just whip up some kind of marketing campaign – Windows 7 Forever – and make a few extra bucks off us stick-in-the-muds.  I really don’t want to switch to Mac OS and Linux is perennially clunky.



Waiting for Linux

In the early 1990s my friend Mike bought a copy of Minix that promised to be a home version of UNIX.  At the time I was into GENIE, CompuServe, Prodigy and BBS systems.  I even ran my own 2-line bulletin board.  I liked the promise of UNIX and how it networked.  Luckily I worked at a university and also had access to USENET and FTP.  This was before the web.  I eventually found my way to a USENET group that talked about Linux, and it was free.  At the time I was hesitant to spend $69 for Minix, so Linux intrigued me.  However, the instructions for getting the code, making the install discs, and installing Linux were daunting.  I’ve forgotten all the details, but it involved a DOS program for making the floppies, and I had to make a bunch of floppies.  This might have been Slackware, but I don’t remember.  It was a long way from Ubuntu 12.04.


After much work with FTPed files,  I finally got Linux going on an old machine, but I was frustrated that it wouldn’t do any of the things I normally did with a computer at the time.  It was neat, but Linux wasn’t ready to be my computer OS.  After that I’d try Linux again and again, as it evolved, hoping it would become something I’d want to use as my full time computer system.  I remember I was so excited when I got Yggrasil and I could install Linux from a CD.  I could install it from the CD, but I couldn’t mount the CD afterwards.  This was before standard IDE drives and each CD device had its own drivers.  I can remember being so happy the first time I finally got Linux to mount a CD.

Then came Redhat and things got much easier.  Over the years Linux distributions got so easy to install that it was almost nothing to throw Linux on a computer, but I always took it off almost as fast.  After Windows 95 came out, and then Windows 98, using Microsoft got addictive and standard.  I got used to all the popular programs and games and it was just painful to try and switch to Linux.

And why did I want to switch?  The whole open source programming movement was so appealing.  The idea of free and DIY made so much sense.  I thought Linux would catch on and everyone would eventually make it their OS of choice.  But that never happened.  Linux has become a standard for servers and supercomputers, but for desktops it’s never been able to compete with Windows and Macs because they have so much commercial software that’s a breeze to install and use.  It’s a breeze now to install Linux, but adding other programs, especially those not prepackaged for a specific distribution, can still be a major headache.

I could switch to Ubuntu or Mint today and do most of what I like to do on a computer, but with programs that are clunky compared to the slick ones I use on my Windows 7 machine.  If I was truly tempted to switch operating systems it would be to Macintosh OS X, but even OS X is a pain to use after being addicted to Windows all these years.

I’ve been waiting for a long time for the Linux desktop to surpass Windows, and KDE and Gnome have come a long way, but desktop Linux just never catches up.  Most of the people reading my blog will not even know what I’m talking about because Linux is so esoteric.  Over the years I’ve talked a few people into trying Linux.  Linux is great for people who only use Firefox or Chrome to do everything they do on a computer.  But I still like Word, Photoshop, Audible Manager, iTunes, Rhapsody, Spotify, Webshots, and many other Windows based programs.  But even if I was totally cloud based in all my apps, I just prefer Chrome on Windows much more than Linux or the Macintosh.

I recently install Kubuntu on my home Linux box so I could play with Amarok on Linux, but I quickly grew disappointed with it.  I loved how Amarok will find lyrics to display as it plays songs, and the program is rather nice overall, but it feels years behind other programs on Windows 7 and Lion.  Spotify also does lyrics now, and they scroll as the songs plays, and the lyric being sung is highlighted.   Spotify is blazingly fast, Amarok is not.

I keep waiting for Linux, like waiting for Godot.  Linux is always on the horizon, close but far.  For awhile Windows XP was having so many problems that I thought I jump over to Linux, but then XP shot ahead and became reasonable stable.  Then Windows 7 came out, and I even prefer it over OS X.  I’m not sure about Windows 8, but I’ll probably get hooked on it too.  Ubuntu is trying hard to leap ahead, to catch up, but by the time it gets where it’s going, Windows and Mac OS X have shot ahead again.

I want Linux to be my desktop operating system because the Linux philosophy is just so much cooler than the commercial alternatives, but I’m hooked on their crack and I just can’t give it up.

It’s sad to admit, but I’m tired of waiting.  Actually, I’m tired of thinking about computer operating systems.  I started using computers in 1971, and I’ve been waiting over forty years for the future to arrive when computers would do everything, and I’d live with the perfect human/machine interface.  I’m tempted to say Windows 7 is it, and I plan to go no further.  I remember working with a guy who retired and bought a computer with latest WordStar and DOS who told me that system would have to last him the rest of his life.  I wonder if he lived long enough to eat those words?

Computers have been the most fascinating invention in my lifetime, and I have put a lot of my life into learning them, but I think I have reached a point where I don’t want to care about them anymore, not as a hobby or topic of interest.  I just want to use them.  I want computers to be invisible and all I see if my work.  I want the Wizard of Oz to stay unseen behind the curtain.  Linux still demands too much working under the hood, getting grease on my hands, and requiring a toolbox of tools to keep things running.  Windows 8 promises to be the operating system so mundane that it’s transparent.

I guess I’m ready for computers to just be magic rather than advanced technology.

The sad thing is technology changes too fast.  What I learned about the IBM 360 forty years ago is all forgotten now, and there’s a long line of other machines and operating systems that came after it that I’ve forgotten too.  I can’t remember how many programming languages and operating systems I’ve forgotten.  Computer technology has been dazzling, mesmerizing, diverting, but what was it all for?  I used to be able to use a slide rule as quick as some people could use a calculator, but that skill is gone too.  Technology knowledge isn’t like scientific knowledge, or history or mathematics.  It’s not cumulative.  Gadgets just keep changing.

I think computers have become good enough that computer literacy is no longer required.  They aren’t idiot proof yet, but they are getting there.  At one time I thought desktop Linux would be the winner, but I think the race is over and Linux never made it to the finish line for the personal desktop OS.  I also believe, sometime in the near future we’ll buy computers and we won’t even care what operating system is on them, or what version.   We probably won’t even think of them as computers.

JWH – 3/4/12

Netbooks: Windows 7 versus Linux

I’ve been playing with Linux since 1994, but it always disappoints me in use, even though I love the concept of Linux.  Recently, I thought Linux for the desktop was going to make it on netbooks.  My Toshiba netbook came with XP, and it was okay.  Because I didn’t depend on my netbook I felt like experimenting, and tried several netbook specific versions of Linux, including Ubuntu Netbook Remix, Jolicloud and Moblin.

They were cool, especially Jolicloud which tries to control it’s environment like the iPhone/iPad with HTML5 apps, but ultimately I discovered that Windows 7 was by far the best netbook OS for me.  I’m sure the Linux people will have technical reasons to argue that I’m wrong, but for me the aesthetics of how Windows 7 looked on the small screen, it’s speed of booting up, running and shutting down, and it’s battery life just seemed overwhelmingly obvious.  It’s a shame that XP still comes on some netbooks.

However, I’d gladly trade my Toshiba netbook for an iPad.  The small size of the netbook makes it useful for on-the-go computing, but ultimately, various needs will determine whether or not a user wants a netbook or tablet.  If I was a student taking a computer to class, I’d probably want a netbook, but I’m not a student.  Nor a traveling salesman.  I now wished I hadn’t bought a netbook because I think a iPad would better suit my portable at home needs.  And I might even be wrong about that too. I might be better served by a smartphone, like an iPhone or Android.

I’ve read that Windows 7 is too big and power hungry to run on tablet computers and compete with the iPad, and that’s a shame.  I’m very happy with Windows 7.  If I could afford to own a Mac OS machine it might compete, but I’m so happy with Windows 7 that I’m not sure I’d switch if the prices came down on Macs.  Having Windows 7 on my desktop, HTPC and netbook works so well it makes me not want more.  I’m OS satisfied with Windows 7.

After having Jolicloud and Windows 7 on the same machine for awhile, I realized that Windows 7 has won the OS war for me.  I removed Jolicloud, and I gave my second desktop I kept for Ubuntu away.  I now just have three machines: desktop, HTPC, netbook.  All run Windows 7 and they all talk to each other easily.

JWH – 5/14/10

Windows 7 and Apple’s Lost Opportunity

I’ve been extremely happy with Windows 7.  And I’ve been reading that millions of other people love Windows 7 too, including businesses that’s been holding back from upgrading their zillions of XP machines.  This makes me wonder if the anti-Windows crowd has lost their window of opportunity.  Microsoft truly stumbled with Vista.  I liked Vista just fine, but it was the laughing stock of the OS world for many years.  Mac and Linux users thought Microsoft’s success on the desktop was finally over.  It could have been if Steve Jobs would have played his cards right.

If Apple had sold OS X to Windows users to install on their machines during the Vista years, I wonder if the Macintosh would have overthrown the Windows dominance on the desktop.  What a missed opportunity.  You’d have thought Apple would have been offering $49 convert to Macintosh deals to get unhappy Windows users to switch teams.  But no.  And now that Windows 7 is hot, I don’t think they will. 

I did get an old friend to switch to Linux this week.  He had a Vista machine that was badly infected with malware.  It was a laptop that was given to him, so he didn’t have the original Windows disc.  He was thinking about buying a new copy of Windows when I asked if he wanted to try Linux.  I first asked if he had an iPhone or iPod, and when he said no, I then asked what he did with his laptop.  He did everything on the net using Firefox.  He had no stored local files.  I sent him a copy of Mint Linux and he installed it with no trouble and he’s very happy.  Apple could have had a convert.

I have another friend with a slow Windows machine.  I’ve offered to put Linux on her machine, but she said she’d rather buy a new laptop. She’s afraid of Linux.  She does use an iPod, so I’m not sure if she would be happy with Linux, but except for occasionally using Word or Excel, and iTunes, she spends all her time on the net.  I’m hoping she’ll let me convert her old laptop when she gets a new one.   She mostly uses iTunes to rip audio books and put them on her Nano.  I’m wondering if I could get Linux to do that.

Because she hates her current laptop for going so slow and acting up, she doesn’t believe it will ever run good again.  I’ve also offered to wipe it and reinstall her original Windows, but she doesn’t want to do that either.  She thinks only a new machine will make her happy.  I’m wondering if the old machine with Linux would have made her happy.  If Apple had a $49 deal to switch to Macintosh I bet she would have tried it.  She’s always wanted a Mac, but whenever I’ve taken her to the Apple store she freaked out over the Mac prices.

I have Ubuntu on my second desktop at home, but I don’t use it.  I’ve thought about putting Linux on my Toshiba netbook.  I like the idea of Linux even though I love Windows 7.  I would put Windows 7 on the netbook but I don’t want to spend the money.  If Apple offered a cheap OS X upgrade I would do it because I’ve always wanted a Mac at home to play with.

I wonder what the Macintosh OS X market share would be if Apple sold its OS to run on Windows machines?  And would it lower the price of Windows 7.  If I had the choice between Windows 7 or OS X for my netbook for $49 it would be a hard decision.  Apple wants us to buy their hardware, that’s not going to happen.  If we could dual book our existing machines into Windows 7 or OS X, I wonder what the world would end up preferring?

JWH – 3/11/10

Misadventures with Upgrading to Windows 7

I hate those funny I’m a PC – I’m a Mac commercials because they often give misleading information about Microsoft Windows.  However, they were dead on right about the perils of upgrading to Windows 7.  I figure since I had Windows Vista it would be a simple in-place upgrade, but no, I was wrong.  I’m like the girl in the commercial with a boxful of stuff to move – I could, just as easily, start over with a Mac.  But damn, Mr. Jobs, the minimum Mac I want is $1200, and I’m doing my upgrade on the cheap, so I’ll just stick with my old HP.

I wasn’t going to upgrade to Windows 7 until I bought a new machine, because Windows Vista was doing fine by me, and I didn’t want to spend over a hundred dollars to make my desktop look prettier.  However, when I discovered I qualified for a $44.94 academic upgrade, I thought, well, why the hell not.  That offer was for Windows 7 Professional, and I had Vista Home Premium, but I figured I’d take a chance knowing that Microsoft wants like versions to upgrade like versions.  I hoped a more expensive version would upgrade over a less expensive version.  Well, it’s not so Joe.

A few days later after the disc was delivered I popped it into my machine and ran the install.  I was quickly informed I couldn’t do an in-place upgrade.  Bummer.  I was depressed.  At the time I assumed a clean install required reformatting my boot hard drive.  I really didn’t want to reformat my C: drive.  I had a 500gb D: drive, so I thought about switching it with the master drive, but it had 147gb of MP3 songs on it, and even though I have two 250gb external drives I couldn’t find space on them for the songs.  I agonized for a couple of hours thinking of alternative solutions.

Finally I started reading online about Windows 7 upgrades and discovered that a clean install could involve the install program renaming the old windows folder and adding the new operating system without reformatting the drive.  So I went back to the install disk and ran the custom option.  It was then I discovered Windows 7 was willing to install on my secondary 500gb drive, so I let it go there and when everything was said and done I had a dual boot system to Windows 7 and Windows Vista and nothing was deleted.  Not exactly what I wanted, but it was a decent compromise.

The Windows 7 install instructions are scary and confusing.  They should tell people right up front their choices.  In place install, new install on existing drives with no deleting of files, or complete hard drive wipe and fresh install.  Finally, there should be a program to nuke the old copy of Vista and stop the dual booting, but I don’t think there is.

Once I had Windows 7 on my machine I had to start reinstalling all my applications and set up all my configurations, plus reinstall print drivers, etc.  This is very time consuming and still unfinished.  The whole experience gave me lots of ideas for how I’d change Microsoft’s marketing of Windows.

  • First off, there should only be one version of Windows for all users.  It doesn’t have to install all features, but dividing users into classes is just plain stupid.  It adds a lot of aggravation to the user experience.  M$ should find other ways of squeezing out extra bucks from their faithful users.
  • Microsoft charges way too much for Windows.  I have a $499 HP bought 3 years ago.  Paying 1/4th the price of my machine for an upgrade that doesn’t offer that much difference, makes for a disagreeable buying decision, especially when the main reason to upgrade is to fix the previous OS.
  • Why can’t Microsoft invent a way for people to install applications and save configurations that aren’t tied to the OS, or design a method to easily migrated customizations to each new OS version.  I’ve been using personal computers since the late 1970s – so you’d think the idea that we will use our computers for the rest of our lives is the plan and OS makers would find ways to make the personal part of computers stable while undergoing OS transitions.
  • The positive side effect of doing a clean install is it makes the OS run faster for several months.  Microsoft needs to find ways to keep registry rust from slowing down their systems.  Often at work machines get so gunked up with crap that the best thing to do is to nuke them from orbit and start over.  That’s annoying and dumb.
  • The clean install means reconfiguring my music for Rhapsody and iTunes, my media server to my SoundBridge and Blu-Ray player, my audiobook library for, my Webshots and Picasso photo collections, and all my digital devices like MP3 players, iPods, GPS, cameras, voice recorders, etc.  This makes my online music collection on seem fantastically better than my local collections.  I was able to play songs as soon as I had a browser going.  Cloud computing may be the answer to all these problems.  Go, Google, Go!

This all makes me think the OS should come on a piece of hardware, either an easily replaceable chip, or high speed PCIe card.  The OS should be totally separated from the user programs, data, drivers and configurations. 

I would think such a design would be less vulnerable to attacks by viruses and malware.  It should also keep the OS from slowing down because of registry rusting.  And paying over a hundred dollars for an OS upgrade would be more pleasant if it came on tangible hardware.  Even my bargain $45 upgrade seemed expensive when I got a small envelope from UPS with just a single DVD in a sleeve.

The people who clutch Windows XP machines with cold dying fingers are wise not to upgrade.  I’m tired of messing with computers.  I just want them to work.  The Windows 7 upgrade has caused computing confusion and I have to spend hours rebuilding my setup.  It’s great that I’m getting rid of three years of registry rust, and I will unclutter my machine from all the programs I no longer use, but shouldn’t those features be built into the OS? 

How hard would it be for Windows to ask if I wanted any program removed that I haven’t used for a year?  How hard would it be for Windows to have a self-optimizing, self-repairing registry that also routinely backed itself up?  I have noticed a number of nice features of Windows 7 that make me glad I did upgrade, so maybe I’ll discover such stability evolution in the OS, as I work with it.

If I live as long as my mother, I have another 33 years of life, and I don’t want to reorganize my computer system another 11 times before I die.  I want any time spent organizing my digital life to last for the rest of my years, and even after I die, so my wife will have no trouble cleaning up after me.  This really makes me think the OS should be completely separate from my personal digital life.  Microsoft, think about that when you’re planning your next version of Windows.  But wink, wink, we know the solution is cloud computing – what if nobody’s needs to get behind the 8 ball?

JWH – 12/12/9