Libraries in the Age of iPads

If everyone owned an iPad would we need libraries?  Don’t get me wrong, I’m not advocating the demolition of libraries, but with the advent of the internet and ebooks talk about the death of newspapers, magazines and books get more common every year.  If we don’t need those physical objects anymore, why do we need a building and institution to maintain them?  Think about it.  If books, magazines and newspapers disappear from our houses and move into Kindles, Nooks, and iPads, why would we go to the library?  Why would we go to bookstores, new or used? 

Modern libraries are about more than books, patrons also check out movies, audiobooks, music, and periodicals.  But all of those media types are now available on the iPad.  I know older people who grew up with libraries will immediate protest, but remember, us older folk are a dying breed and the up and coming generations are gadget afflicted.

Libraries used to be storehouses of knowledge and librarians worked to collect and preserve the printed word.  That’s still true of academic libraries, but public libraries have moved into an era of supplying what their patrons want, so as soon as a book is ignored for a specific period of time, it gets jettisoned from the collection.  Most people think of libraries as free books, free movies, free music albums, and free magazines and newspapers.  I think a lot of people think we should have libraries to provide a cultural outlet for the poor.  But the internet provides more free stuff to read and watch.

The death of libraries is pretty much unthinkable now, but don’t be surprise when city bean counters start making suggestions about closing them.  I grew up  loving libraries, and even worked in public and academic libraries.  They don’t seem as crowded with patrons as they used be.  I hardly go to the library anymore myself, not since the internet.  I saw the video of Steve Jobs presenting the iPad and showing off its ebook features and it struck me that devices like the iPad will be the library of the future.  When I was growing up futurists would talk about having a handheld device with the Library of Congress in it.  We’re getting spookily close, aren’t we?

The book is evolving too.  When it escapes the limitation of the page, adding multimedia and hypertext the book will no longer fit on a library shelf.  Printed books, newspapers and magazines might become extinct, but imagine what will replace them.  There is no reason to make a distinction between newspapers and magazines anymore.  That might become true for books and novels too.  Newspapers used to be frequently published information printed on cheap paper.  Magazines and journals had longer periods between publication and were printed on better paper, suitable for long term storage in libraries. 

The electronic page is not limited by time, paper quality or cost of printing.  Newspapers and magazines use to be text plus photographs.  Electronic publication is text plus photographs, video, sound recording, animation and other multimedia.  Go look at the iPad video and tell me if kids will even want to go to the library or read books and magazines.  And what about you?

ipad

I like the name iPad, just one vowel different from the iPod, but many of my friends have expressed a dislike for the name, and some of my women friends tell me the name brings up bad connotations with them.  I think Steve Jobs should have named it the iLibrary.

JWH – 1/28/10

Predicting the Apple Tablet

The computer press is buzzing with rumors of an Apple tablet computer.  I don’t think anyone knows anything for sure, and I expect Steve Jobs to wow people when he finally announces whatever he plans to show off as his next big product.  It may be a tablet computer, or it might be something surprisingly different.  Most people speculate it will be something to compete against netbooks and ebook readers, both of which are hot products that Apple currently doesn’t compete against.  A lot of rumor sites show an artist conception of a giant iPod touch like device.  Some sites are even predicting it will cost $800-900 dollars.

Well, if the Apple tablet is to compete against netbooks and ebooks the price needs to be a whole lot closer to $400.  I do think a touch screen tablet is the perfect competition to a netbook, but I’m not sure about such a device replacing ebooks.  Maybe for reading magazines, newspapers and web content, but not for reading fiction.  Think about it, reading fiction is something people do for hours on end, and imagine holding a heavy device that long?  I think the Kindle and Nook are too big.  My ideal ebook would be mostly screen, about the size between a mass market paperback page and a trade paperback page, weigh next to nothing, be extremely durable, and cheap enough so I wouldn’t be afraid to carry it everywhere I go.  That doesn’t describe any of the Apple tablet rumors.

If a new Apple device is going to be rolled out it must not compete with the iPhone or the MacBook, and that puts it squarely into the netbook space.  Netbooks have keyboards and work just like bigger computers.  A tablet doesn’t.  So how many of your everyday routines can be enhanced by a 10 inch touch screen?  For me, that would be something to replace magazines and newspapers.  If bookworms balk at paying $260 for an ebook reader to make novel reading easier, will newshounds accept spending $800 to make reading the news easier?  Not me.

You can get a 22” LCD monitor for around $200, and sometimes a lot less.  For reading the New York Times, magazines and blogs, I’d love to have a monitor I could hold in my lap and read while sitting in my La-Z-Boy.  A 10-12” screen would probably be ideal, but it must be thin and very light.  It doesn’t need to be a computer, but just a reader, maybe just a portable Acrobat reader.  And I don’t want to pay more than the cost of a monitor to have a monitor I can hold in my lap to read.

I’m not sure I’d even want video and music from such a device, especially if it will raise the price significantly.  I just want to read what I normally sit at the computer and read, but in a comfortable chair.  My Zune, iPod Nano and Sansa Clip are perfect for audiobooks and music.  My iPod touch mostly goes untouched.  My netbook mostly goes untouched.  I just don’t do that much on the go computing.

The iPhone was brilliant.  The iPod was brilliant.  Do we really need the iTablet?  How many more useful devices can we use?  Steve Jobs does have an amazing track record of creating devices we didn’t have before but can’t live without now:  Apple II, Mac, iPod and iPhone.  But I prefer a PC to a Mac.  The Sansa Clip is easier to carry than my iPod Nano or touch, and even though I’d love an iPhone I won’t spend the money.  The $64,000 question is whether or not Steve Jobs will announce something I will run out and buy.  I’d own a Mac if they were cheaper, so I’m guessing I’ll be waiting on the HP tablet computer.

JWH – 1/7/10

The Battle of the eBook Readers

For a couple years now the Amazon Kindle has been the standard for ebook reading, even though the Sony Reader has been around longer and many people find it just as good. Now, the Barnes & Noble Nook has come out – so we have the Big Three of ebook readers, even though there are other ebook readers available, and more being planned.  I have no intention of trying to review them, or compare their technology, PC World does a good job here.  I’ve owned a number of ebook readers, including the Kindle, but I’ve sold or given them away.  So far they haven’t quite lived up to my expectations.  The trouble is, I again want to own an ebook reader.

My first impulse is to buy a Kindle 2 because I’d like to have its text-to-speech feature, and because I buy a lot of books from Amazon.  Then I happened to read, “Sony rolls out EPUB content, makes B&N nook transition easy and international.”   By using the EPUB standard, Barnes & Noble and Sony have made Amazon look like Apple promoting it’s proprietary AAC song format over the standard MP3 song.  Amazon created a nice music business attacking Apple by marketing MP3 songs and this is what Sony and B&N are doing to Amazon by promoting the open EPUB format.  Sony is even abandoning its proprietary format and switching to EPUB which makes it compete better against the B&N and Amazon at the same time.  Great strategic move.

If you bought an ebook reader, you’d want buy books from any bookstore, right?  Televisions can tune any channel, but imagine having to buy a different TV set for each station in town.  That’s sort of how ebook readers work now.  For each online ebook store, there’s an ebook reader they promote.  Another sign that the open EPUB format is really the emerging standard is some public libraries are now lending books in this format.  

Look at eReader.com, an online store that only sells ebooks, they promote the eSlick Reader.  Oddly enough, this site is owned by Barnes & Noble, so it appears B&N are promoting two competing ebook readers – I bet that will change soon!  This site has been around for awhile and also provides the free eReader software for a bunch of existing computing devices to let folks read ebooks on any digital devices they already own, like computers, laptops, PDAs, cell phones, including the popular iPhone.

If you visit the Sony Reader Store you won’t see any mention that the B&N Nook can read their books for sale, nor does the B&N Nook site promote selling their books to Sony Reader owners.  Behind the scenes, EPUB ebook users are finding ways to load books from both stores on their favorite device.  This leaves the Kindle kind of lonely by itself.  Fictionwise, another general ebook online storefront, promotes the eSlick reader too, but works to get their books on any device they legally can.  When you purchase a book it goes into your library, but when you go to download it, you are given a long list of supported file formats, including the Kindle and EPUB.  Fictionwise even has a Fictionwise Kindle eBookstore.  So even though the Kindle is proprietary, being the horse out front of the pack means it gets a lot of support.

See how confusing it is to decide which ebook reader to buy?  To make the issue even more complicated, go read David Pogue’s “Should e-Books Be Copy Protected?”  The MP3 song is very easy to steal and share, but there are now plenty of legal sites selling the unprotected MP3 song.  Would it be possible for all online bookstores to sell the same unprotected EPUB formatted book that could be read on any ebook reader?  Maybe in a few years, but right now book publishers are too scared to sell unprotected ebook files, so the protected EPUB format is emerging as the standard now.

Deciding which ebook reader to buy now means aligning with a particular bookstore, or finding one that works with many different bookstores.  Some ebook readers are expensive because they come with broadband cell phones built into them to easily purchase books from the proprietary bookstore that markets them.  I’d rather have a cheaper ebook reader that works like a MP3 player and use my computer to buy books and be my file librarian.  That way I wouldn’t be tied to any bookstore. 

I have an iPod Nano and touch, Microsoft Zune and Sansa Clip all loaded with audiobooks that I buy from Audible.com.  I never feel the need to buy an audiobook when I’m away from home.  I always run out of battery juice before books.  I’ve never run out of books away from home because my devices all hold so many.  Ebook readers can hold thousands of books, so I don’t see the need to spend money for instant access.  Besides, it’s just a way to tie the device to one bookseller.

If there was a Kindle 3 for $150 without the wireless, I buy it because of the text-to-speech feature.  Otherwise, I’d probably like the Sony Reader Pocket Edition, that uses EPUB, but it costs a little too much right now, even at Amazon’s $189 price.  I also wished the Sony Reader Pocket Edition had a 6” screen.  It would still be much smaller than Kindle and full size Sony Reader.  The smaller screen means more page turning, but many reviewers love it because it’s so easy to carry around.  I was always afraid to carry my Kindle 1 away from home.  That brings up another factor.  It hurts far less to lose a $150 reader than one that costs $300.

The reason why I want to get another ebook reader is because I want to read science fiction magazines.  The top four print magazines have been available for a couple years now for ebook readers, and I’m hoping the emerging online magazines will start offering EPUB editions too.  The ebook reader might increase readership for the dying short story market. 

One plus to the ebook readers that have wireless/broadband connections is they make provisions for reading blogs.  I bought a netbook hoping it would be a great portable RSS reader, but it hasn’t worked out.  The form factor isn’t very book like.  I’m hoping that RSS software for reading blogs will migrate onto ebook readers too.  iTunes manages podcasts for iPods, so why can’t software manage blogs for ebook readers?

However, what’s really emerging is bookworms love ebook readers for consuming books.  Ebook readers are really perfect for fiction reading, and especially for people who love to read fiction in quantity on the cheap.  And this is great – it saves trees and the environment.  Because libraries are starting to lend EPUB books, and because there are about a million out of print books available for ebook readers, and because there are many online stores selling ebooks cheaper than print books, bookworms really benefit from owning an ebook reader.  I think the time for ebook readers have finally arrived and I have to get back in the game again.

JWH – 12/19/9

Readability

Most people hate reading on a computer screen, but many of those people also spend hours reading online, so what’s the solution?  Try Readability.  I was reading an interview with John Joseph Adams, an editor for The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, a guy who has to do A LOT of reading, and he mentioned he liked to read submissions on his Mac with a utility called Tofu.  I immediately jumped over to the Tofu site to discover there wasn’t a Windows version.  Bummer!  I even jumped over to the Apple Store to price a Mac, but quickly abandoned that bright idea when I was slapped hard by sticker shock.  Necessity being the mother of Googling, I made several attempts to find the right search phrase until I found Readability.  [Note to Tofu people – naming your product with the same name as common food is a poor marketing decision.]

I have no idea how Readability works, but it’s magic.  Go to their site, play around with the controls to find a reading style you like, and then right-click the Readability button and select add to Favorites.  (I’m using IE, so it will be slightly different for other browsers.)  Then go to a web page you want to read that’s not very eye friendly readable, select Readability from your Favorites, and Presto-Chango the page is Harry Potterly reformatted for easy reading.

Readability doesn’t work with every web page, nor does it retain all the page features you may want to see – it will filter out videos, but it gets the feature photos while somehow filtering out the ad graphics.  So if you visit a web page that looks like a hood of a racing car covered with ads, this little gem of a utility will clean up your view.

Readability works best on pages with long articles and not pages with lots of reading snippets.  Readability makes most web pages into large print book reading.  Most web designers must be 19 year old kids with better than 20-20 vision who work on giant Macintosh monitors who never imagine people will come to their web pages wanting to read that bland annoying text stuff that clutters up their beautiful graphical layouts.

Often when reading web essays with tiny text, where the layout locks out my browser’s ability to enlarge the font, I’ll cut and paste the text into Word just so I could read it.  Readability automatically does that now.  Readability is like having a Kindle for blog pages where you can easily set up your default reading style so everything you buy to read is formatted for your personal reading pleasure.

Web browser programmers should program this concept into every browser, rather than replying on the Text size feature, which is often disappointing to use.

Very cool.  So cool I added Readability to my Favorites Bar in IE.  Now when I’m on a web page which I want to spend some time reading, I click the Readability button and Shazam, the page becomes easy to read.  Unfortunately, Readability doesn’t work like Tofu with computer documents, so I still want to find an app for Windows that does that.  If you know of one, let me know.

JWH – 12/5/9

iStories: The Short Story Hit List 100 Weekly

Let’s face it, the heyday of the short story as a popular art form was decades ago, probably as far back as when F. Scott Fitzgerald got rich and famous selling stories to the Saturday Evening Post and Colliers.  Except for would-be writers, required reading for students, fan fiction fanatics and a damn few diehard short story lovers, the marketing of short stories is almost invisible to the average citizen of our pop culture country.  Is the short story art form unpopular because readers don’t like them or because short stories are so poorly marketed?

The short story art form hangs on by a thread, like the art forms of poetry and playwriting.  I expect the remaining for-profit scifi, fantasy, mystery and literary magazines to die off in the next 5-10 years unless something drastically changes.  The question is, can a drastic change be made?

Is there anything that can be done to revive the short story art form to popularity?  The first question to ask is:  What do the popular art forms have that the unpopular ones don’t?  Movies, television shows, songs, video games and novels are the most popular art forms in our world today, ranked roughly in that order.  A single movie, TV show, song, game or book can be admired and loved by millions of fans, and wide consumption in these artistic endeavors are routine.  When was the last time a short story was popular enough to have a 1,000 readers in one week?  How many people actually read the short story in each issue of The New Yorker?

Besides legions of fans, the most important factor that popular art forms have and short stories don’t are Hit Lists.  Movies, TV shows, songs, games and books are extremely well reviewed, charted, rated and ranked by sales and popularity.  Each art has legions of critics working hard to stay current and teach how each example of their craft fits into an overall history. 

Every week we are well informed about the most successful premieres of each art.  Hell, weekend movie sales figures often get touted on the national morning news shows, and sometimes on the nightly news.  Book readers all know about The New York Times Bestseller lists.  We have the Nielsen ratings for TV shows and the Billboard 100 for pop songs.  There are countless websites and magazines that track the success of computer games.  And songs are marketed by hits on the radio and on online stores like iTunes.

As a culture we love keeping up with what’s popular, but is what’s popular just the stuff we track with Hit Lists?  I think so.  If short stories were ranked weekly would they gain popularity?  I think they might, but many factors would have to come into play.

Most important, the Short Story Hit List 100 would have to be weekly and track all genres of short stories.  Separating them out into story types is deadly.  We don’t rank blockbuster movies or best selling books by topic.  The Oscars and Emmys aren’t divided up by genre.  It would be a total water cooler buzz kill to divide short stories out into special interest groupings.  A hit story must be one that people want to read and talk about because of its popularity, not because it puts the reader into a sub-culture.

Next, its vitally important that short stories be sold as singles, and not part of albums (magazines or anthologies).  Few people like to buy a magazine full of unknown short stories.  It’s like getting a free music CD with a music magazine – most of the songs are mediocre and the CD is a disappointment.  People want hits, and that has to apply to short stories too.

For short stories to make a comeback they need a marketing site like iTunes.  They need to be sold for 99 cents in a standard digital format like MP3 songs.  Unfortunately, ebook readers, smart phones and computers use a variety of ebook formats that hurt the concept of making short stories popular, so the iStories site needs to offer all the possible formats but hide the dirty details from the buyers.  Fictionwise.com illustrates well how this is possible.

Ultimately, this universal format needs to be DRM free so short stories can be easily stolen and shared – or if they have to have a DRM, then it needs a mechanism for limited sharing between friends.  Unfortunately, the unethical viral marketing of copyrighted material is too good of a selling tool to ignore.  And I think in the future, this universal digital short story format should be roomy enough to contain graphics, music, video and audio readings.  In other words readers can read the story, listen to the story read on audio, read with eyes and listen with ears at the same time, read the story with background music turned on or off, and see illustrations or photos to enhance the story.  But this super ebook format isn’t an issue right now.

Short stories need to get away from printed formats as their premiere venues (but nice chapbook editions will make excellent marketing additions to the overall sales, and we can think anthology and story collection sales as long term publishing).  The primary publishing format should be for ebook readers and smart phones.  Like I said, short stories should be sold as singles with the goal of creating hits.  Collections and anthologies should be left to the book world to market because they would hurt creating hit short stories.

The key to revitalizing the short story art form is creating hugely popular stories that will become the topic of conversation between people all over the nation.  People share both the experience and love of movies, TV shows, books, song and video games.  When was the last time you were in a conversation about a short story?  When was the last time a group of people at your office discussed a short story they had all read?  This happens all the time with movies and TV shows, and to a lesser extent books, songs and video games.

One of the major factors against marketing short stories is there are too many of them on the net for free.  Free is incredibly bad for revitalizing the short story art form.  Bad editors, no editors and no editing has created a glut of short stories on the Internet.  No one likes to listen to amateur musicians or mediocre bands.  Every time you play a song you want it to be a great song.  When you go to the movies you expect to be blown away.  When you read a book you want to find one that has deep emotional impact. 

To revitalize the short story art form will require a seal of approval either attained by popularity or critics.  Our imaginary iStories site cannot be a slush pile for the common reader to wade through.  Nor should its editors have to select from a tremendous slush pile to find stories to promote on the site.  Stories should be submitted by agents or professional editors that can be trusted.  There needs to be some kind of farm team looking for talent to feed into the system.  I would think existing print and online magazines could play the role as the iStories systems develops, but eventually I expect magazines to die off.  Thus professional editors would become talent scouts and agents for stories.

A theoretical iStories site should also limit the number of new stories released each week, and find ways to publicize the best.  New ways to promote stories should be invented.  They need corporate backers like film studies or record companies but I doubt existing book publishers would take on this role.  It might be left to magazines – so The New Yorker and Asimov’s Science Fiction would campaign to get their stories noticed, and bring attention back to their business.

We have to get away from depending on fiction magazine sales and magazine subscriptions because those marketing methods are no longer successful at making short stories popular.  Buying a magazine is like buying an unknown album with the hope of finding a hit song, especially when you aren’t familiar with any of the artists.  Buying a magazine subscription is like buying a bunch of unknown albums hoping to find several hit songs.  200 channels with nothing to read, huh?  People want smash hits.

I doubt my ideas about revitalizing the short story art form will ever happen, but at least I’m making a point about creating a popular art form.  Look at the short video and how YouTube is promoting them.  Until there is a way to sell hit videos they will never become a major art form, but they could.  Most people go to YouTube and similar sites and look at the most watched videos hoping to discover something really fun.  Yesterday I discovered the Muppets version of “Bohemian Rhapsody” because almost six million people have watched it.  That clue paid off because the video was excellent entertainment.

Back in the 1910s, 1920s and 1930s short stories were popular enough that they were the topic of social discussions.  If you watch the credits of old movies you’ll often see movies based on short stories.  Newsstands were filled with hundreds of short story magazines.  Short story reading was a popular evening pastime until radio slowed it down and television practically killed it off.  In fact, television is what replaced the short story for people looking for after work diversion.

Short stories are not mini-novels.  The best are jewels of intense fictional expression that are a unique art form.  Sadly, they are a dying art form.  Because of iPods, iPhones, Kindles, Nooks, and other electronic gadgets that people carry around, short stories have another chance to become popular again.  Short stories can be read quietly anywhere on an iPhone, or even listened to in an audio edition.  They must compete with songs, audio books, novels, movies, videos, computer games and television shows in this small venue, but there is room to compete well if short stories were marketed correctly.

And by correct marketing I mean as singles.  Unless people are saying to their friends, “Have you read the new short story by so and so,” to their friends, short stories will be doomed to an ever shrinking fan base.

How to Start

If all the ebook sites, like Amazon’s Kindle home page, Barnes and Noble Nook, the Sony Reader, and the general ebook fiction sites like Fictionwise.com, eBooks.com, eReader.com would create a section for short stories and a mechanism to track their sales, that would be a big start.  It would help even more if they would offer spin-off sites that specialized in short stories.

Another angle of attack would be if online magazines maintained a hit list of their most popular stories ranked by web visitor hits.  They might need to program mechanisms to keep authors or fans from constantly reloading the page to produce fake hits.  And they need to track hits from all their backlog of stories and not just the current issue.  It would be important to provide numbers so popularity could be gauged against stories at other online magazine sites.  And like songs, and even movies, sometimes it takes weeks or months to have a breakout hit.

We’d also need critics that specialize in reviewing short stories, and ones that would be also willing to track many short story web sites and tally the numbers each week to give attention to the stories getting the most attention each week across the web.

If short story reading ever did catch on again, it would be fantastic if magazines like Entertainment Weekly devoted a section to them like the do movies, DVDs, books, music and television.

It would be a tremendous help if best of the year anthologists like those who compile the Best American Short Stories and the various yearly genre anthologies if they would maintain a blog about their ongoing efforts to select stories, even to the point of showing how they tally competing stories as they are discovering them.  We need as much PR as possible on stories climbing the charts, so to speak.

Unfortunately, most fiction magazines are monthly, bi-monthly or quarterly, and hit stories need to be tracked weekly, or even in real time.  Web sites that change their content less than weekly get ignored and forgotten.

It would help greatly if a social bookmarking site like StumbleUpon created a short fiction section for tracking popular short fiction reading.  On the other hand such sites help promote free reading, and that competes with our goal.

The biggest success for revitalizing short stories is if a company would create a web site like Audible.com, or an online store like iTunes just for the sale of short stories.  They should sell both ebook editions and audio narrated editions of short stories.  I’d suggest a standard price too, 99 cents for either ebook editions for reading with the eyes, or audio editions for reading with the ears.  Short story are longer than songs, so some marketing folk might want to price them higher, but they are usually experienced only once, so they should be far cheaper than renting a movie.

Readers can help too.  If you read a great story share it with your friends.  Talk about it.  Tell them where to buy it.  I know this might be painful, but get in the habit of buying short stories, and avoid free stories.  If you read and enjoy free stories at online magazines at least donate money, but it would be better if you supported a paid-subscription site.  Flooding the market with free stories ruins the market and hurts the art form.  Don’t promote free stories, it dilutes the market for selling stories.  Don’t read stories that haven’t been accepted by an editorial process and edited unless you’re part of a writing workshop group or critiquing stories for a friend.  Even fan fiction could be improved by these rules.

Authors like providing free copies of their short stories on the web to help promote their work in general.  This might be good for their career but it has produced so many professionally written short stories for free on the net that short story fans no longer want to buy stories.  Many fans now expect to find a copy of any short story they want for free and there are web sites to track free fiction to help them. 

Free stories are bad for the short story art form in the long run and maybe an additional reason why print magazines subscriptions are declining even faster in recent years.  Maybe free stories should only be those that are older than one year, or five years, and don’t compete with new sales.

If you love short stories and want to promote the art form then do whatever you can to help short story writers and publishers make money.  I tend to doubt the short story market will be revived, but now is the time to try because of the switch to Internet publishing and ebook reading.

JWH – 11/28/9