While everyone is remembering it was fifty years ago that America discovered The Beatles, I’m remembering it was fifty years ago that I discovered Robert A. Heinlein – a discovery that had far more importance to me. 1964 was the year after Project Mercury, and the year before Project Gemini. Back then each space mission got uninterrupted coverage on CBS, NBC and ABC, and I always got to stay home from school and watch. 1964 was also the year a very futuristic World’s Fair in NYC and everyone seemed to be thinking about the decades to come.
1964 was the year I turned 13 and I started thinking about my future.
Now it’s 2014 and I’ll turn 63 later is year, and I think about my past.
As much as I love The Beatles and remembering 1964, 2014 is my 50th anniversary of reading Robert A. Heinlein. I thought it might be interesting to analyze why reading the twelve Heinlein juveniles I first discovered in 1964 was so much more important than “Twist and Shout.” Wouldn’t it be fun to read a series of blogs by baby boomers remembering all the artists that meant more to them from 1964 than The Beatles?
I read science fiction before 1964, but it wasn’t until I discovered Heinlein that I became a hardcore science fiction fan. I turned 13 on November 25, 1964. For some reason I started puberty by rejecting religion and God, becoming an atheist, and embracing science fiction. I’ve always joked that science fiction was my religion, which made Heinlein my messiah.
I have my 8th grade English teacher to thank for introducing me to Heinlein, although I’m pretty sure I would have discovered him one way or another. I wished I remembered this lady’s name, and had a photograph of her. She had a remarkable teaching method. For each six weeks grading period she required the class to read and report on three books. However, if you read five, she would raise your grade one letter. That allowed me to be a B student that year – at least for my English class. My teacher provided us with a list of approved authors and Robert A. Heinlein was one. In the 1940s and 1950s Heinlein had published twelve young adult novels with Charles Scribner’s Sons that had gotten a lot of recognition with librarians and teachers.
The first of the twelve juveniles I discovered was Red Planet, after that I quickly consumed the other eleven, and then went on to read the Heinlein adult novels. Sadly I don’t remember the order in which I read them. I do remember the night I read Have Space Suit-Will Travel, my favorite Heinlein book, and my all-time favorite science fiction novel.
I was babysitting for an airman my dad knew from work at Homestead Air Force Base. I was dropped off at their house around eight, after the kids were already put to bed, and the couple didn’t return home until after three. So I was paid fifty cents an hour to read Have Space Suit-Will Travel. I was blown away. When the couple came home the young dad offered to drive me home, I told him I’d walk. It was 3:30am, and I wasn’t even sure where I was. I had a vague idea my house was north of their house, so I started walking. It was eerie out – completely dead, with a bit of a mist from the dew.
I wasn’t afraid, but the long walk was surreal. All I could think about was Kip’s adventures, going from Earth, to the Moon, to Pluto, to a planet orbiting Vega, to the Lesser Magellanic Cloud. My brain speeded on thinking about the future and I felt very alive.
A sliver of the Moon glowed in the sky that dark night fifty years ago, and the stars looked down on me, and I up at them. I was living the mundane life of an 8th grader, the 1960s was heating up, and all I could think about was living in the 21st century. Now, it’s 2014, and my future is almost over, and more and more, I think about the past.
The promise and potential of space travel was why I loved Heinlein. Elementary school had been about Project Mercury, Project Gemini was going to be my junior high years, and Project Apollo my high school years. I started the 1st grade a couple months before Sputnik went into orbit, and graduated high school a couple months before Neal Armstrong walked on the Moon. That, reading science fiction, and being a baby boomer growing up with the rock music revolution of the 1960s, did a number on me.
So did the drugs. Strangely, by 1968, science fiction had taken me far further than the chemical trips I had started taking. Reading Stranger in a Stranger Land in 1965, I’m sure I saw it way different than Heinlein intended.
I read everything I could about NASA. In 1964 all I could think about was the rock music on the radio, the science fiction I read, and the future of manned space flight. I was positive I’d grow up and in my lifetime we’d build a colony on the Moon and Mars, and just maybe, I might get to go.
Boy, was I wrong.
Heinlein made it all sound so simple, so obvious, so right. Humans were meant to go to the stars. His twelve young adult novels were a roadmap for all my tomorrows.
|1947||Rocket Ship Galileo||Moon|
|1948||Space Cadet||Asteroids, Venus|
|1950||Farmer in the Sky||Ganymede|
|1952||The Rolling Stones||Moon, Mars, Asteroids|
|1954||The Star Beast||Earth with interstellar visitors|
|1955||Tunnel in the Sky||interstellar|
|1956||Time for the Stars||interstellar|
|1957||Citizen of the Galaxy||interstellar|
|1958||Have Space Suit—Will Travel||Moon, Pluto, Vega 5, Lesser Magellanic Cloud|
Ross, Morrie and Art, three teens in Heinlein’s first juvenile only go as far as the Moon, but in the last book, Kip and Peewee leave the galaxy. The first half-dozen are about interplanetary travel, the second half-dozen have youngsters like me going to the stars. These books made me a true believer in space travel in the same way Christians believe in heaven.
I’m now an atheist to my own religion, and Heinlein and his books are in my past. They are just fun stories now, myths I lived by growing up a half-century ago. The future was everything I never expected. As I spend my retirement years trying to write science fiction, I imagine a much different future than I did at age thirteen. What will the next 50 years be like? Can I conceive of a more realistic future, one that might happen, or will I only invented imaginary futures that will become fantasies like the Heinlein stories? Do I stir up the passion of kids to believe in scientific fairy tales, or do I try to give them hope about real scientific possibilities?
Like the 1964 me, I still contemplate the future. I have no space suit, I will not travel to the stars, but the future still holds exciting possibilities. If I’m alive in 2051, what will I write about looking back on the next fifty years?
JWH – 2/3/14
6 thoughts on “1964–Fifty Years of Reading Robert A. Heinlein”
Great Blog. We share similar experiences.
The future might be far stranger than anything you (or I) can imagine. But let us leave that aside for the moment. Although I am younger than you are, Heinlein was a part of my youth. Later, Stanislaw Lem, among others. I’ll say this: Lem I can read now, and it is still a revelation, each and every time, but Heinlein? Heinlein’s books are often (not always) dated, in that they reflect the times they were written in. They are formulaic… For me, Lem is timeless. You’ve spoken of Lem as well, and I am interested to hear how you would compare the two.
I am betting you won’t be alive in 2051, but that doesn’t stop you from speculating about it, does it now? You speak of your future as if it was over. Stop that. It’s annoying. Forgive me for being so… forward.
Yeah, those books made me believe the future was without limits. Humanity could do anything, there were no borders. I think it is important to pass that belief on: no limits: go on.
You might find this article of Interest.
Thanks. I’m surprised by how often the “where’s my flying car” philosophy shows up. Evidently, a lot of us are disappointed with how the future has turned out. And I agree with the conclusion of that article, we need to come up with another economic system to finance space exploration. For profit just won’t cut it.
And how many people wanted a Jetsons future? Back in 1966, I thought the philosophy of Star Trek would be obvious to all, but what happened? I guess as a species, we’re just homebodies. Or is the homebody’s?
I forgot to mention — check out the cover of that issue (Baffler #19), a flying car picture originally seen on the front of a Russian youth magazine.
My intro to SF was similar to yours. I was given a stack of SF books by my dads friend. It was E E Smith. I devoured them thsn it wads onward and outward. I avoided growing up by reading SF. Heinlein came later.
I still read, but i have grown up ( somewhat)