Prayers for Atheists 1

Why would atheists want to pray if they don’t believe in God?  Let’s make a theoretical assumption that tomorrow we all wake up and it’s obvious to everyone that God doesn’t exist.  Do we just throw away all the sacred books, bulldoze the churches and forget religion completely?  Or would we recycle the components of worship for practical secular use?  For thousands of years the best and brightest of the human race applied their minds to understanding reality through the eyes of God.  What if we step back, and say God was not the inspiration to these spiritual seers, but their own seeking minds, then all sacred knowledge discovered by our ancestors in the name of the all-powerful was really created by the minds of men.  Religion serves homo sapiens whether God exists or not.

What if religion has a purpose even if God doesn’t exist.  Take for instance the “Serenity Prayer” made famous by Alcoholics Anonymous.

God grant me the serenity
To accept the things I cannot change;
Courage to change the things I can;
And wisdom to know the difference.

The prayer begins by petitioning God, but is God’s assistance really necessary for the prayer to succeed?  We could begin, “Let the universe grant me the serenity,” to imply that all of reality offers help, or we can pray to ourselves by saying “If I can find the serenity,” which affirms that we are pulling ourselves up by our own bootstraps.  The goal really doesn’t change, we want to grasp a philosophical concept that is extremely useful that’s embedded within the words of the prayer.

People often see God in the role of the father, but can you imagine being a father to 7,000,000,000 children all pleading for attention?  And since we’ve discovered how big the universe is, it could mean that God’s children runs to a 7 with pages and pages of zeroes.  Even if God does exist, don’t you think it’s time we stand on our own feet and give the old Eternal One a breather? 

In the prayer above, the petitioner is asking for a kind of serenity that comes with special wisdom.  Is that wisdom something we can learn on our own, or teach one another?  The serenity prayer is a fantastic prayer, one of my favorites, that gets to the absolute core of religion.  From the dawn of the conscious mind we have all wanted to understand reality, and on the surface this prayer requests the wisdom to understand reality in a very fundamental way.

The serenity prayer is very subtle and has onion-like layers.  On first reading we think it’s asking for the ability to look around ourselves, at reality outside our body, and see what’s possible and impossible to change.  It implies we want an answer every time we attempt to alter reality as to whether we have to strength to make the change.  But at a much deeper level, at the spiritual level, it’s asking for the knowledge to see how our minds work, or our souls, if you wish, so we can program our perception of the world. 

Do people and events around us encourage us to drink, or do  motivations within pour another shot?  Do we hate our jobs because of the people we work with or because we can’t control our emotions?  Did we fail to write that novel because life never gave us the time or because we never made the time?  What does it take to beat cancer, and when must I accept death?

This is why AA loves this prayer – to stop drinking requires the power to change our inner programming, but the prayer works just as well on any negative or even positive addiction, whether you want to give up heroin or become an artist.  Of course everyone assumes they can find the power to change, and that might not be true.  That’s why the prayer requests serenity as the primary subject of the prayer.

Eastern and Western religions break down along two lines of force:  acceptance and change, so the Serenity Prayer meets the two in the middle.  The force of the Western mind has been to adapt reality to our desires, while Eastern philosophies has been to teach the gentle path of acceptance.  The Western path has always been about the will of God and obedience.  To the faithful, that will came from a higher power, but to the secular mind, the will of God has always been the desire of the leaders, the men who wanted to build a nation or cathedral and worked their people like the Great and Wondrous Oz, pulling strings and levers behind the alter.

The Serenity Prayer can work without an all powerful creator, or even without a powerful leader wearing religious robes, or even without a mundane individual called a psychiatrist, because it does work when the petitioner gains their own self-wisdom.  That person can get outside help, as soon as they see how to accept it, but the help can come from anywhere or anyone.  If you want to credit an unseen force, and call it God, that works too, but the real success belongs to the individual who can make the prayer come true with enlightenment.

The actual purpose of religion has always been to build stronger souls, to create civilization by evolving the minds of men and women.  If you look at the Serenity Prayer it’s about change, and if the Force of Evolution had a conscious mind, the Serenity Prayer would guide it.  The Serenity Prayer is amazing because it doesn’t just beg, “God give me power to change the world.” 

The prayer asks for serenity, a state of being that comes from meditation and wisdom.  It asks for acceptance for what we can’t change – a power that lets us avoid frustration and living a life of quiet desperation.  Then it asks for courage to change what we can, implying that we need to move full speed ahead when we can and not live with comfort of the status quo.  Finally the prayer asks to tell the difference between what we can and cannot change, because that’s real wisdom.

Any atheist, agnostic or theist who meditates on The Serenity Prayer each morning will benefit from its inspirational power.  What I’d like to do is create a book of prayers for the atheists, but for now I’ll create a series of blog posts about my favorite prayers.  I tend to believe that my atheist friends in their hast to free themselves of the illusions of theism might have overlooked hardcore religious wisdom that works well with the reality of science.  We might not have an eternal soul watched over by a guardian angel, but we do have a soulful mind that is evolving.  And we might not have a God that shapes our lives, but we do have the collective wisdom of the ages that inspires us to keep trying, to keep evolving.

JWH – 11/4/9 

A Case of Conscience by James Blish

A Case of Conscience by James Blish is the 1959 Hugo award winning novel that was recently produced as an unabridged audio book by Audible Frontiers, the science fiction and fantasy publishing imprint from Audible.com.  The book is wonderfully narrated by Jay Snyder.  When I became addicted to audio books back in 2002 I constantly searched for classic science fiction books on audio.  There weren’t many available.  For about a year now Audible Frontiers has been cranking out far more SF audio books than I have time to listen to.  Even today, when I go through the audio sections at book stores, I seldom see many science fiction titles for sale.

You can buy A Case of Conscience as an audio book through Amazon, via a link back to Audible, or from the iTunes Store, for $17-19 dollars, but the cheapest way to get it is to join Audible.com.  To get those bargain prices requires committing to a 1 or 2 book-a-month plan.  I buy an annual 24-pack deal and get books for $9.56 each.  To get some idea of why you might want to join Audible.com, look at Hugo Winners on Audible and Heinlein on Audio.  The catch is you have to be tech savvy enough to listen to audio books on your iPod or MP3 digital player.  Audible.com does allow you to burn CDs, but that takes some tech know-how too.

Now, do I recommend you go buy A Case of Conscience?  I enjoyed the book, but I’ve got to warn modern readers about 1950s science fiction.  A Case of Conscience is a fix-up novel, combining the 1953 novella set on the distant planet Lithia, with newer material, with the same characters back on Earth continuing the story.  Many classic science fiction novels, like Foundation by Isaac Asimov, and City by Clifford Simak, were fix-up novels.  They feel like reading short stories rather than novels.  The second warning I have to give is about the nature of classic SF, especially books from the 1950s.  They are idea driven, rather than plot driven.  My guess is young people today who love action driven science fiction might grumble about these older cerebral stories.

James Blish does some excellent world-building with Lithia.  It’s a planet poor in heavy metals like iron, but the intelligent beings there have learned alternate routes to scientific discoveries and have engineered a technologically advance society.  The Lithians never discovered magnetism and electricity, but have created technology based on static electricity, and pushed the limits of biology further than we have.  Blish did a great job creating a fascinating planet and culture, but that’s only the setup for the real idea that’s central to the book.

A Case of Conscience combines science fiction and religion to make for a philosophical story.  A team of four scientists are sent to evaluate Lithia, but the biologist, Ramon Ruiz-Sanchez, is a member of the Society of Jesus, a Jesuit, and he makes a startling claim about Lithia and the Lithians.  The Lithians have no concept of God, afterlife, sin, or even things like fiction or lies.  They are logical.  Their culture is an atheist’s utopia.  I love what Blish does with this, and I won’t spoil any of his story.  I’m very appreciative to Steve Feldberg and Audible.com for bringing this book to audio.  I tried to read A Case of Conscience twice before in my life and didn’t get into it either time.  This wonderful audio reading made it completely accessible to me.  Blish’s style was too dry for me to read, but lovely to listen to.  I don’t know why.

The real reason I want to recommend this book is because we should think about contact with alien culture and religion.  What if SETI makes first contact and our new friends have never even imagined the concept of God?  That is possible.  What will they do when we tell them about our spiritual theories?  What if they have theories about the origin of the universe that we never thought about?

Most fundamentalists cannot handle even minor variations in their own religion, much less deal with ecumenical diversity of world religions.  Their narrowly focused personally held concepts would probably be blown away by ancient ideas in the many dead religions in our history, so how would they react to a true alien spirituality?  So what happens if the nightly news programs are bombarded with religious ideas from light years away?  What if these alien missionaries have existed for millions of years and know a lot more about everything?  Will we form cargo cults in reaction to these superior wisdom, like primitive people in the 20th century when encountering modern westerners for the first time?

In the next ten thousand years we will probably never meet any aliens face to face, but there’s a good chance of finally having some success with SETI, and initiate interstellar texting sessions with dialog response times in the decades, centuries or even millennia.  Even if we detected an alien signal today, it could take so long to respond and develop a way to converse that it could be centuries before we get down to chatting about vague philosophical concepts.  The novelty of the alien existence will wear off before we know what they think.

Today, because of science fiction, I believe most of the world assumes that there are intelligent life forms elsewhere in the universe.  We also assume we’ll share the same mathematics, physics and chemistry, but will probably diverge with biology.  But what kind of overlap will be possible for philosophy, religion, art and music?  Music has a relationship with mathematics and physics, so it is possible there could be strange alien music we could hear and think of as melody.  Art connects with vision which also connects with physics.  The idea of creating beautiful objects that nature didn’t could be common.

Alien religion and philosophy are harder to imagine.  James Blish essential creates an alien world and then forces a John Milton like Catholic interpretation upon it.  Mary Doria Russell explores the same ground in her magnificent novel, The Sparrow.  Is it possible to evaluate an alien religion without seeing it through our own glasses made from our religion?  Can we even see a religion without being religious?  Do dolphins and whales have religion?  They are the closest thing we have to alien intelligence and we know so little about them.

Is worship the defining characteristic of religion?  Is it possible to have religion without gods, either seen or unseen?  If all aliens have the same image in their homes, do we consider that a sign of religion?  Would aliens exploring our world think of religion when they count all the photos of Brittany Spears?

We often talk as if God is the same deity whether the Earthy believer is Christian, Muslim or Jew.  Would our alien friends see that?  Would they assume our God is their God?  For most of this planet’s history, our believers believed their God made this world, but they never knew it was just one of billions upon billions of worlds.  Does each world get their own creator?  Or is their one God that knows about every sparrow on this world, also know about every sparrow like creature on every other world?

In the end, we have to judge James Blish on how he handles his religious problem in A Case of Conscience.  Does the ending imply that Father Ramon Ruiz-Sanchez was right in his judgement of Lithia?  If that is true, then we have to believe that Blish does believe, at least for this story, that it’s possible that our God is supreme, that our Earth is the center of reality, and that all the rest of the universe is part of a lesson to teach us about God’s word.  Isn’t it rather strange that God would build such a big school-house just for us?

What would a universal religion be like that covered a universe fourteen billion light years across and was home to billions of intelligent life-forms and their planets.  Knowing as much astronomy as I do I find it hard not to be an atheist, but I could be wrong.  I believe religion is only practical at the tribal level, but again I could be wrong.  But if there is one God and his territory covers all of the cosmos, then I can’t help believe that mathematics, physics, chemistry and all the other sciences is the true Bible of this God.

JWH 12/21/8