Faith in Science

Unless you are a scientist working on a very specific area of research and actually understand a particular phenomenon in detail, you take everything else stated as true by science on faith. When I argue with my friends we need to change society to slow down global warming I’m really preaching on faith – my faith in a particular idea. I can’t personally prove its true. I’m testifying for the global warming gospel. I am not a scientist. I read a lot of popular science books and magazines, and that isn’t science either, nor does it make me a scientist or even scientific in my thinking. Popular science books are the Matthew, Mark, Luke and John gospels of the world of science.  The real enlightenment is through understanding experiments. 

Last night I attended the Memphis Astronomical Association meeting and heard a lecture about how the speed of light was figured out over the centuries.  We are told the speed of light is 186,282 miles per second in a vacuum.  I can’t prove that.  The lecture last night covered several methods that scientists used since the 17th century to calculate the speed of light.  If I wanted to I could recreate those experiments myself and have a better understanding – one that is not based on faith.

For our culture to be based on scientific experience rather than faith we need to train kids to practice science.  Even though measuring the speed of light is a difficult problem, there are probably many many ways to get the job done.  One creative approach I found was by melting marshmallows in a microwave.  I have no idea if this experiment is real or not. Right now it’s in the faith realm.  There are other stories like it on the net but using cheese instead of marshmallows.  My point is people can come up with creative ways to solve the problem.  Teachers need to find more of these experiments to help raise kids to understand how things actually work.  If the marshmallow experiment is bogus, then they need to learn why?

I’m reading Death by Black Hole by Neil deGrasse Tyson, and in one chapter he explains how much astronomy can be achieve by an ordinary person with a stick.  I don’t need to duplicate these stick experiments because Tyson explains them so well that I’m willing to accept them as true.  However, I think our schools would be better if we actually let kids do these stick experiments.  Knowledge is more than words.  Our society is failing because people live too much in fiction and not enough in fact. 

When I argue with my friends about global warming I need to understand the science behind the concept and I need to do some experiments on my own to have experience, or at least read about specific experiments and understand them.  So I’m wondering what are a basic list of experiments that can prove that people are impacting the global weather?  These can be thought experiments too – Einstein discovered a lot about reality with some good thought experiments.

From my reading, most scientists now support the idea that humans are impacting the global environment, but many people do not believe that or refuse to believe that.  Global warming is a vital issue with many people but it ranks very low among all vital issues the public is considering in the current presidential campaign.  If the impact of global warming will be as dire as some scientists predict it should be rated #1.  Why isn’t it then?

There are very few climatological scientists in the world, and few people want to take up the discipline as a hobby.  Most of the talk about global warming deals with CO2.  Normal people have to take on faith that extra carbon in the atmosphere is bad and that people are at fault by adding it to the air in their daily lives.  I meet lots of people who flat out say they don’t believe this.  How can I counter this belief without whipping out a series of scientific proofs to change their mind?

Our society and all the other societies around the globe need to be more scientific in their thinking.  Faith in science doesn’t cut it.  We need an educational system where more real experiments are practiced by school kids.  After that, they need to study of historical experiments until their logic is a sixth sense in which they view the world.  We need to develop a mind set where we can understand scientific ideas and not just argue the ideas on faith, like ancient religious scholars discussing how many angels fit on the head of a pin.

Now all I have to do is go out and find those proofs – any help will be welcomed.

Jim

 

 

Hugo Winners on Audible

Years ago when I first started listening to audio books I felt there wasn’t much available in the way of great science fiction. Recorded Books did have a lot of good Sci-Fi titles, but they weren’t easy to get. This week I noticed many of those Recorded Books titles have come to Audible, and many other award winning science fiction books are now available. I decided to see just how many Hugo winning novels could be bought at Audible.com and I was surprised to find quite a few.

The Hugo winning novel I’d like to hear the most on audio is Hyperion by Dan Simmons.  But if you’re an audio book publisher there’s plenty of good titles to produce.

I also checked these other sites to see if I could fill in any gaps – but with limited luck.

  • BA – Blackstone Audio
  • BOT – Books on Tape
  • RB – Recorded Books
  • AB – AudioBookstandDL
  • Year Title Audible Other
    2009 The Graveyard Book
    by Neil Gaiman
    Yes
    2008 The Yiddish Policemen’s Union
    by Michael Chabon
    Yes
    2007 Rainbows End by Vernor Vinge Yes  
    2006 Spin by Robert Charles Wilson Yes  
    2005 Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell by Susanna Clarke Yes  
    2004 Paladin of Souls by Lois McMaster Bujold Yes  
    2003 Hominids by Robert J. Sawyer Yes  
    2002 American Gods by Neil Gaiman Yes  
    2001 Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire by J.K. Rowling   Yes
    2000 A Deepness in the Sky by Vernor Vinge Yes  
    1999 To Say Nothing of the Dog by Connie Willis Yes  
    1998 Forever Peace by Joe Haldeman Yes  
    1997 Blue Mars by Kim Stanley Robinson Yes  
    1996 The Diamond Age by Neal Stephenson Yes  
    1995 Mirror Dance by Lois McMaster Bujold Yes  
    1994 Green Mars by Kim Stanley Robinson Yes  
    1993 A Fire Upon the Deep by Vernor Vinge
    Doomsday Book by Connie Willis
    Yes/
    Yes
     
    1992 Barrayar by Lois McMaster Bujold Yes  
    1991 The Vor Game by Lois McMaster Bujold Yes  
    1990 Hyperion by Dan Simmons Yes  
    1989 Cyteen by C. J. Cherryh    
    1988 The Uplift War by David Brin Yes  
    1987 Speaker for the Dead by Orson Scott Card Yes  
    1986 Ender’s Game by Orson Scott Card Yes  
    1985 Neuromancer by William Gibson   BOT
    1984 Startide Rising by David Brin Yes  
    1983 Foundation’s Edge by Isaac Asimov    
    1982 Downbelow Station by C. J. Cherryh    
    1981 The Snow Queen by Joan D. Vinge    
    1980 The Fountains of Paradise by Arthur C. Clarke Yes  
    1979 Dreamsnake by Vonda McIntyre Yes BA
    1978 Gateway by Frederik Pohl Yes  
    1977 Where Late the Sweet Birds Sang by Kate Wilhelm Yes  
    1976 The Forever War by Joe Haldeman Yes  
    1975 The Dispossessed by Ursula K. Le Guin    
    1974 Rendezvous with Rama by Arthur C. Clarke Yes  
    1973 The Gods Themselves by Isaac Asimov    
    1972 To Your Scattered Bodies Go by Philip José Farmer Yes  
    1971 Ringworld by Larry Niven Yes  
    1970 The Left Hand of Darkness by Ursula K. Le Guin    
    1969 Stand on Zanzibar by John Brunner    
    1968 Lord of Light by Roger Zelazny Yes  
    1967 The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress by Robert A. Heinlein Yes  
    1966 Dune by Frank Herbert
    This Immortal by Roger Zelazny
    Yes/Yes  
    1965 The Wanderer by Fritz Leiber Yes  
    1964 Way Station by Clifford D. Simak Yes  
    1963 The Man in the High Castle by Philip K. Dick Yes  
    1962 Stranger in a Strange Land by Robert A. Heinlein Yes  
    1961 A Canticle for Leibowitz by Walter M. Miller    
    1960 Starship Troopers by Robert A. Heinlein Yes  
    1959 A Case of Conscience by James Blish Yes  
    1958 The Big Time by Fritz Leiber Yes  
    1957 Double Star by Robert A. Heinlein Yes  
    1956 They’d Rather Be Right by Mark Clifton and Frank Riley    
    1954 The Demolished Man by Alfred Bester    

Going Paperless 4 – Alternative Methods

I’m not sure how many people are interested in the topic of going paperless since it gets few hits on the stats page – but I’m enjoying exploring the idea.  And I did get an email from Adam Kadleck suggesting I try out Zinio, an online magazine service.  Since he works for the company he also provided me with a sample subscription to Saveur Magazine, a colorful periodical about cuisine.

A huge shortcoming of the Kindle is its lack of ability to show photographs and color graphics.  I remember reading an early complaint about the Kindle from a Slashdot kid who whined the Kindle couldn’t handle comics and porn -reading material that Zinio can handle. 

A magazine is not very magazine-like on the Kindle.  Zinio sells magazines and has a custom software reader so magazine pages look exactly like they do in their paper form.  It even fakes page turning with graphics and sound.  Zinio is paperless but with more of the natural features of paper.  Saveur Magazine would not work on the Kindle.  Without the appetizing photos of the food it would lose much of its appeal.

The Zinio software reader works very well on my 19″ wide-screen LCD monitor showing two full page at a time.  However, I need to zoom in to read the content.  Zinio makes this a breeze, but I wonder if I had a 22″ monitor if I could read without zooming.  The height of my 19″ monitor is about an inch less than the height of a standard magazine after you take into account the Zinio menu.  The screen view on 22″ monitor could well be the same height as a paper magazine.

Right now Zinio has a decent selection of magazines, but far from the selection of a good bookstore.  And like ebooks, the issue of the pricing of e-magazines is still questionable.  Why pay the same subscription price for a paperless magazine when the publisher isn’t covering the overhead for paper, printing and postage?  It’s not uncommon to see $5.99 and $6.99 mags at the bookstore – I would think going paperless and using Zinio they should sell for $1.99 at most.  PC World is $19.97 a year on Zinio.  I’ve gotten better offers than that in the mail.  Science is $99.00 – and that seems way too much for electrons.

The photographs on Zinio look pretty good but nowhere near the quality of a slick paper print.  Strangely enough the quality reminds me of the new paper used in Sky & Telescope, a big step down from their old paper.  You can magnify Zinio photographs but they break up.  It would be great if the Zinio photographs offered quality features over print magazines, like larger hi-rez popup views.

The feature I would want the most from Zinio is full text indexing.  I have several years of Sky & Telescope on my shelves, but finding an article means lots of flipping pages.  It would be great if I had a library of Zinio magazines that I could quickly query for instant data.

There is an online company Press Display that offers reading newspapers online in the same way Zinio works for magazines, but their reader is browser based.  Even though many of these newspapers offer free online editions, the ability to read a newspaper that looks like the printed edition does have value, maybe even value worth paying.  The New York Times offers the Times Reader for $14.95 a month.  It’s not a system for seeing the paper as printed, but a online viewer to making newspaper reading better than reading through a web browser, so its yet another alternative to paper.

The problem with these solutions is being tied to your monitor for reading.  Now I don’t mind reading off a monitor – screen resolution is now better than newsprint and fonts can be enlarged to beat tiny magazine typefaces.  What I’d like is to read in my La-Z-Boy, but to do that will require waiting for an ebook reader with a hi-rez color screen the size of a standard magazine page.  I expect such a Star Trek like tablet in the next few years.

I don’t think it will be long before we’ll stop murdering millions of trees just to let people read a couple headlines and do the daily crossword.  Going paperless means changing habits but I think there will be technology to help us to keep our old addictive reading behaviors while adding new features that help us process knowledge.

Going Paperless 5

Jim